On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > >> David Nalesnik already did this: >> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=838 >> >>> I think the issue at this point is not LilyPond's lack of ability to >>> do this or that, >>> but rather the lack of a vibrant cookbook culture like Python has. >> >> I think you're right. > > It is a bit more than that. A cookbook is nice (and we have excellent > cooks here), but of more importance is a standard cook you can hand it > to. Namely a sort of module system. A place where you can drop things > in, call them by name, and they will come. Copy&paste jobs are nice, > but a standard place where things can be called from, and maintained and > improved by someone else, beats that.
Indeed! We need a standard cookbook and a cookbook standard. I hope that GLISS will help with this. And, of course, your continous effort is angled toward these issues - i appreciate that! cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
