----- Original Message -----
From: "Janek Warchol" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: "LilyPond User Group" <[email protected]>; "Devel"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Regression test rater
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
First of all, thanks to those who have spent time and energy rating the
regression test at http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtests/ - we're
very
close to having a rating for all the tests.
[...]
"LilyPond Regression Test Rater
Well - believe it or not, either you've reviewed ALL the LilyPond
regtests, in which case thanks and please take a well earned rest, or
other reviewers have given us good enough coverage already."
wow! Kudos!
:)
Janek
Don't get too excited. It's a bug - it looks like every regtest has
received a single rating, but we're going for 4 per regtest, to get a good
average. I'll fix it tomorrow....
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
