Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:03 PM > Kind-of fixed. The way the files are presented is aimed at ensuring no-one > rates a regtest more than once, and that they get the least-rated files > presented to them in a random order. The only way I seem to be able to get > this to work is with nested SQL statements, and this is quite slow. The > alternative would be to make it simpler, so that users simply get files > which they haven't rated, with no ordering apart from that. However, the > downside of this is that we may get lots of files with 4 ratings, but some > remain with only 1 until we've done the lot. Let me know what you'd prefer, > fellow raters.
I'm getting load times of just less than 10 sec fairly consistently. This seems quite acceptable. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
