Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > Am 15.02.2013 12:39, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Am 15.02.2013 12:18, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: >>> >>> Am 15.02.2013 11:40, schrieb Urs Liska: >>> You can create an adhoc-book in scheme with a #{-#} construct: >>> writeScoreOddEven = >>> #(define-void-function (parser location score) >>> (ly:score?) >>> (let ((book #{ \book { \score { $score } } #})) >>> ; process with first-number 1 >>> Unfortunately this gives me the following error: >>> >>> In procedure memoization in expression (let (book #)): >> Try copy&paste. You are missing one. > Huh? I'm missing one what?
Paren. Jan-Peter wrote (let ((book ... and you wrote (let (book ... > Am I right that the '(let ...' line is one statement and that the last > )' in this line should match the one right before 'let'? No. > In fact I did copy&paste, the line as above is quoted from Jan-Peter's > email. But of course we're not here to blame but to solve the problem > ;-) But you did not _leave_ it the way you copied it. The error message clearly points out that you removed a paren. >>> Your example was either missing a closing bracket or having one >>> opening bracket too much. But that doesn't change anything. >> No, you just did not understand that >> ; process with first-number 1 >> was supposed to be replaced by the rest of the function body, depending >> on what you want done. > Of course I know that (the comment line was actually from _my_ file). > Attached you see the complete file. How about _not_ "correcting" the line by Jan-Peter and instead adding the matching closing paren at the _end_ of the function? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
