Am 15.02.2013 13:01, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
OK, copy&paste lost a paren ... but not in the let-line, but in the
end of the whole function.
Ah, OK. And since I 'corrected' the non-matching brackets in the line
itself, Frescobaldi's syntax highlighting led me to believe everything
was alright :-(
let opens a new "scope", so you start with a new block:
(let ((book #{ ... #})
(something-else 42)) ; paren closes definitions
; now do something inside this scope using the defined vars
(ly:process-book book ...)
) ; close let-block
Thanks for the explanation, now it works perfectly (hope this statement
holds until I try to use it in the real context ...)
Best
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
