> > The only ones that needed re-positioning were the rarer ones > > that were longer than a whole rest. Also the dots on about half of > > the rests also still needed re-positioning. > > Could you elaborate?
See the attached files. This one makes it clearer than the previous one. The red rests and blue dots are the ones my function has moved. The 3 longest rests are lower on the custom staff than I wanted, so my function moves them up to where they usually are on the standard staff, but then the dots became centered vertically on the longest two rests. So my function moves those dots up where they usually appear. Dots were also centered vertically on quarter, 8th, and 16th rests on the custom staff, so my function moves them up to their usual position. I also show some staves with different line patterns where the Y-offset of the rests is manually set to 0. Sometimes the dots are centered on the rests, and sometimes they are in their usual position (half a staff space higher). This is odd since the dot position apparently depends on the staff line pattern. I suppose that the dots might be centered by default on the rest and then be shifted up to avoid a line through the middle of the rest. (However, on one of the staves they appear in their usual position even though there is no line to avoid.) -Paul Morris
shiftRests3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
shiftRests3.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user