Am 06.08.2013 01:26, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs (et al.),
I'm probably biased but I find the appearance of the 'old' score infinitely
superior.
Immediately, one notices [in the newer version] what a poor choice it is to
have the triplet number (over the middle of the triplet) above, as it is easily
confused with the fingering number immediately to its right.
The issue that struck me most is the general spacing which seems too
regular somehow. While it isn't the problem to be too light (or 'anemic'
as one usually says in that context) I feel that the triplet groups are
somewhat soulless.
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
