Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Urs (et al.), > >> I'm probably biased but I find the appearance of the 'old' score > infinitely superior. > > Immediately, one notices [in the newer version] what a poor choice it > is to have the triplet number (over the middle of the triplet) above, > as it is easily confused with the fingering number immediately to its > right. > >>> in general, we are more interested in the inspiration by state of >>> the art plate engraving rather than state of the art computer engraving, >>> since LilyPond wants to be a frontrunner in computer engraving. > > Agreed — I will always be aiming for that with these stylesheets.
Well, that's a bit like making a Bauhaus impression by picking the right tapestry: the main responsibility lies with the placement and spacing algorithms, and the stylesheets then have to combine with them into a coherent whole with a consistent look that avoids making the algorithms fall apart. So the stylesheets are sort of coevolving with the algorithms responsible for the _work_ part of our look. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
