Carl Peterson <carlopeter...@gmail.com> writes: > This is a question of whether it makes sense from the human side or > the computer side. From the computer side, certainly. However, adding > a reply-to target doesn't fix that. If someone's going to reply from > the digest, they're going to reply from the digest.
You would likely be surprised. In the presence of a "Reply-To" header, both the standard "Reply" and "Reply-to-all" _have_ to go to the given address and nowhere else. Which is why adding a "Reply-To" header is a strong and often annoying measure. My mail reader Gnus offers an extra obscure "Reply to mail with broken Reply-To header" command for bypassing this, but in a web interface, this should not be an obvious choice. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
