Am 05.03.2014 15:26, schrieb [email protected]:
Urs:
...
- make lilyglyphs available to plain latex
(instead of only xe- and lua-)
(Karl Hammar has volunteered)
Proof of concept:
http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/musik/bin/lilyfont.readme
http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/musik/bin/lilyfont.pl
http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/musik/bin/lilyfont.tex
http://turkos.aspodata.se/tmp/lilyfont.pdf
Next step is to find a suitable mapping between the postscript glyphs
names and a the latex commands in the resulting .sty file, I could
possible extract that and scaling and raise info from the lilyglyphs
package.
Maybe it would be a more generic/straightforward/maintainable approach
not to create a parallel approach but to inject it in the current behaviour:
- generate a mapping between the postscript and the OpenType glyph names
- create an additional implementation to access the glyphs from the font
(currently there are different implementations to access the glyphs
when running lualatex or xelatex)
- use \lilyGetGlyph just as for the existing versions.
This wouldn't automatically create commands for all existing glyphs but
it would make the use consistent regardless of the used latex engine.
But actually I don't know enough about this to be able to say anything
_really_ useful (which is why I haven't implemented it so far.
Urs
Hälsningar,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sverige
0173 140 57
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Urs Liska
+49(0)179-4642905
[email protected]
http://beautifulScores.net
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
