2014-03-05 14:53 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska <[email protected]>: > If we reach the goal we will update the source repository to a usable state > and remove the references to the publisher.
Why remove them? After all, it _was_ published by Sound-rel. > _And_ we'll significantly reduce > the retail prices for the printed books. > > If we overfund it (up to a certain amount) we'll distribute the money > between the three collaborators because the fees we have charged so far for > our work are actually ridiculous. > > If that target should be overachieved we'll donate back a major part of the > surplus to LilyPond development, by sharing parts with David Kastrup and by > sponsoring bug fixes or feature requests. > > (Details of all this have to be decided yet) > > ### > Currently I think about offering the following perks, more ideas (or > comments to my suggestions) welcome: > > 1€ - hug (no further action)) > 5€ - appreciation > Name will be kept in the source distribution > (but nothing really visible) > (will be included in any of the following perks) > 10€ - serious appreciation > Same as above but additionally visual place on our website > (as long as that might exist) That's too much diversity. I'd have just one perk without being listed and one perk with being listed (in the sources _and_ future prints). > 15€ - PDF/source package > snapshot of the current state of the source directory, > including PDFs of the individual scores. > As long as we haven't reached the goal this will be a private > copy, without license to redistribute, and without any > cleaning up. I'd price this at 20 eur - it's still cheaper than buying the book in retail. Or maybe have two separate perks: just pdf and pdf+source. > 15€ - Custom transposition > (to be delivered as PDF or nicely printed) way too cheap imo. Unless we really don't want to make _any_ adjustments after transposing, not even the most ugly problems. The printed version should perhaps be a separate perk imo. I assume this is for 1 song? We could have a "bundled" perk with multople transpositions. > 35/50€ - Printed book plus ZIP > It's actually like buying the book regularly, > plus the ZIP package (and the "appreciation") I'd suggest one more perk that gives multiple copies maybe? > 100€ - Big Appreciation > Add a special thanks section in the edition. > Name will be in the source distribution and will > appear in any further printed release > 150€ - Interview on Scores of Beauty > (limited to 5) > ???€ - Bug/Feature (limited to 3-5) > Sponsor one bug fix or feature implementation > (in LilyPond, LilyPond libraries or LaTeX) > Top up the same amount to the project campaign > (See below for suggestions) > ??€ - Merchandise articles > with picture (our logo?) and text, something like > "I helped freeing Fried" ;-) or > "I support Free Culture" > Ideas: Coffee mug, mouse pad, puzzle > > ### > Bug/feature perks > These should be an explicit part of the campaign, so they have to be defined > in advance. > If you have an idea, or even can implementing something for money, please > tell me. > > Ideas: > - Implement a meaningful document statistic with Frescobaldi's library > (I might be able to do that) > - make \shape and \shapeII aware of wrong number of siblings (again). > -> point to problems when changed line breaking > messes up manually shaped slurs > - make lilyglyphs available to plain latex > (instead of only xe- and lua-) > (Karl Hammar has volunteered) > - Add a certain number/range of commands to lilyglyphs > (can give several options as a choice) > (I can do that) > - Add new layout control modes to Frescobaldi > - Incorporate Frescobaldi's ly-module/tool in LilyPond's repository > -> make a new command line tool available > -> enable LilyPond code with syntax highlighting on lilypond.org > > ### > Features that might be sponsored later (if we should raise enough money). > These don't have to be specified as explicitly as the perks, but I would > like to give at least a few examples of what we have in mind with that. > Further suggestions welcome, but I think they have to be focused on our > interest of scholarly editing. I still think that most of these shouldn't be listed as explicit perks (because we'd have waaay to many perks then) but as something to be agreed upon individually. best, Janek :-) _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
