Hi Simon (et al.), > I think this is one of the few questions where it’s really difficult to > establish a standard.
Agreed. It’s the one big disappointment that I have in Gould’s engraving book: she doesn’t even address the subject at all!! > Plus: there’s still some leap between the lilypond standard output – which > one may usually take as „standard” indeed – and other options which are > available if one looks for them. I’ve always found the Lilypond chord names default(s) to be totally unacceptable; I have a ChordNames.ly standard include, which changes font, size, placement, and contains an almost complete rewrite of the chord symbols. Cheers, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
