---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: guoguocuozuoduo <brian777...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM
Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain
styles
To: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
>There should be for neo-modern, neo-modern-cautionary, neo-modern-voice,
neo-modern-voice-cautionary, but not dodecaphonic-no->repeat.
For the record, I think that all of the styles should suppress the repeated
accidental, or none should. It comes down to whether the same pitch
separated by a rest should be considered an immediate repetition. I think
so. Consider the following:
{ fis'4-. fis'-. }
vs.
{ fis'8 r fis' r }
It doesn't make much sense to me that there should be a difference in
behavior between the two in any style which detects immediate repetition.
--David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
