Hi Gilberto,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current > behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above > the accidental looks superfluous, but usually the works that really benefit > from dodecaphonic-no-repeat have a much more complex musical texture. Have > a > look on this example below: > > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.png> > example.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.ly> > > Would you say your suggestion is beneficial here? > > No :) (And I should probably take a lesson from some of my own music...) --David
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
