Hi, Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 23:14:14 schrieb Big Noise: > there's a snippet that can help: > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=459
[…] > Does that help your issue? that one helped to get the stuff out to the colleagues, so thanks! But still, looking at the sourcecode, it seems more like a workaround than a real solution. I consider it to be a bug. Personally, I know of two major versions of displaying that stuff: 1.: <c e g d'> == Cadd9 and <c e g b d> == C9 2.: <c e g d'> == C9 and <c e g b d> == C7/9 Nothing I ever read, made <c e g d'> == <c e g h d>, simply because it's just wrong. There was another chord, which I couldn't make print the right way: Cadd11. It whould be <c e g f'> but neither c1:11^7^9 (which I considered to be right Lilypond-Syntax), nor c11^7.9 (which was my second chance input) gave the correct result. And C11 (what was displayed in both trials) is just wrong, since it whould be <c e g b d f>, which is a totally different chord. Any of the devs there, who can clearify this one? -- MfG Jan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
