>> That's effectively what I'm doing. I'm changing the X-offset >> callback because it's only there that the property >> toward-stem-shift is read (see scm/output-lib.scm). The trick is >> allowing two different concurrent values for toward-stem-shift: 1.0 >> for when the staccato is alone, 0.0 when other articulations are >> present (like a portato) In my experiment, I simply did what the >> engraver does regarding toward-stem-shift.
Thanks for working on this! Will this also influence the positioning of the end (or start) of a slur? Since I guess that the answer is no, I wonder how this could be improved, namely to set maximum and minimum horizontal coordinates for slurs that must not be exceeded. > [...] what about changing toward-stem-shift to a number-pair instead > of a number? Sounds sensible. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user