On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I > want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why > each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And > why is it only rests and notes that have augmentation dots are affected in > \oneVoice mode this way? There is no way other than clashing note column > warnings to tell that two voices have each issued concurrent rests in > \oneVoice mode. It’s just kind of weird that augmentation dots get this > special treatment.
I think you are misusing \oneVoice here; it isn't for merging things into a single voice, but rather for telling LilyPond that there is only one voice that it needs to position on the staff. If you are still `feeding' it two (or more) voices you will have to do some extra work to tell LilyPond what to do or you will get errors and/or unintended output.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
