Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices
here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single
voice. That's why each voice has issued the \oneVoice command
before asserting the r2. And why is it only rests and notes that
have augmentation dots are affected in \oneVoice mode this way?
There is no way other than clashing note column warnings to tell
that two voices have each issued concurrent rests in \oneVoice
mode. It's just kind of weird that augmentation dots get this
special treatment.
I think you are misusing \oneVoice here;
Indeed the name of the command makes perfectly clear that it's
contradictory and nonsensical (and lily basically requires to be given
sensible input) to write \oneVoice and have two voices all the same. Too
much noise for such a basic misconception!
Yours, Simon
it isn't for merging things into a single voice, but rather for
telling LilyPond that there is only one voice that it needs to
position on the staff. If you are still `feeding' it two (or more)
voices you will have to do some extra work to tell LilyPond what to do
or you will get errors and/or unintended output.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
