On 30 August 2011 19:09, James Westby <james.wes...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem. >> The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide >> immovable references to the state of a set of git trees so that people >> can reproduce builds exactly. We don't need the change to tag a build >> after its been deemed correct, we just need to implement a function to >> tag across the gits so that all the shas continue to exist. > > I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what course of action you are advocating > here? > > It sounds like you are advocating using a model where we use tags to > ensure that the referenced revisions are reachable from a head, and then > refer to the sha ids of the revisions in the manifest. Is that correct?
Yup. > Thanks, > > James > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
