On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:18:04 +0100
Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Dave Pigott <dave.pig...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On 11 Nov 2011, at 10:56, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Dave,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:36:45 +0000
> > > Dave Pigott <dave.pig...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > []
> > >> look and feel!), we're asking that you hold off submitting jobs
> > >> to LAVA until we give the go-ahead.
> > >
> > > "Hold-off" as in "please don't submit jobs now - they disrupt
> > > us", or "if you submit now, be prepared to not get expected
> > > results"?
> >
> > Mostly the first, in that we need a pipeline to be able to submit
> > jobs and check them.
> >
> >
> Problem is that with CI we cannot really hold off submitting jobs
> because that happens ad-hoc when a build finishes.
> 
> I understand the need to have a clean lab pipe. However, for that we
> need to work on a mechanism that allows you
> to put submitted jobs into a queue that isn't processed etc.
> 
> Would also be useful to put jobs there during maintenance so the
> frontend doesn't fail submitting it's job.

I exactly made a switch to allow non-fail behavior recently. I didn't
actually activated it though, as previous LAVA downtime finished before
I could. But we now have infra in place to avoid downtime propagation. 

And if it's useful for Validation team to temporary cut any submissions
from android-build, I can do it easily and with priority over IRC or
email any time.



-- 
Best Regards,
Paul

Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to