On 29 June 2012 07:52, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Another two cases fail in precise test:
>
> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation 
> test
> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread
> simulation test
> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation 
> test
> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g
> thread simulation test
>
> In previous test, we have
> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c  -O0 -g  thread
> simulation test
> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c  -O0 -g
> thread simulation test

Have you tried looking into the logs. gcc.log.xz and gcc.sum.xz should
show what's happening ? Having said that I took a quick look and
there's something funny. I don't find an unsupported case in those
logs, but the testsuite-diff shows it. I don't fully understand what's
going on here.

Ramana



>
>  -Zhenqiang
>
> On 29 June 2012 11:40, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 29 June 2012 11:28, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 29 June 2012 14:57, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> Michael,
>>>>
>>>> Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a
>>>> new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test.
>>>>
>>>> ~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036
>>>> armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1
>>>>
>>>> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation 
>>>> test
>>>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread
>>>> simulation test
>>>
>>> Not sure there.  Ulrich, could that real?
>>
>> If you check the log in previous test
>> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild335-ursa5-cortexa9hfr1/testsuite-diff.txt,
>> the case is not shown as "UNSUPPORTED".
>>
>> So it seams it is a test environment issue.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Zhenqiang
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to