On 29 June 2012 11:00, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2012 17:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan > <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 29 June 2012 07:52, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Another two cases fail in precise test: >>> >>> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation >>> test >>> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread >>> simulation test >>> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation >>> test >>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g >>> thread simulation test >>> >>> In previous test, we have >>> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread >>> simulation test >>> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g >>> thread simulation test >> >> Have you tried looking into the logs. gcc.log.xz and gcc.sum.xz should >> show what's happening ? Having said that I took a quick look and >> there's something funny. I don't find an unsupported case in those >> logs, but the testsuite-diff shows it. I don't fully understand what's >> going on here. >> >> Ramana > > For atomic-other-short.c, error is from gdb. Here is the log from gcc.log.xz > at > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa1-cortexa9hfr1/ > > /cbuild/slaves/ursa1/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simulate-thread/simulate-thread.gdb:11: > Error in sourced command file:UNSUPPORTED: > gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation > test
Hmmm but it didn't show up in the test log from Uli's merge request which is where I looked :) Ramana _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
