I think I'd rather just focus on monkey runner stuff. Chi Thu, what doe TEMA give us that Monkey runner doesn't?
On 28 March 2012 07:05, Le.chi Thu <[email protected]> wrote: > I will talk with you about the tema. > > BR > > /Chi Thu > > On 27 March 2012 22:07, Paul Larson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Zach, I think the main thing we were looking for feedback from you on is >> this tema test, and whether you consider it to be useful beyond what >> monkeyrunner already provides. There seems to be some overlap. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Zach Pfeffer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 23 March 2012 08:07, Le.chi Thu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > sorry not include the link to blueprints. >>> > >>> > Here they are : >>> > >>> > >>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/manually-health-check >>> > >>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite >>> > >>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/health-check-job-vexpress >>> > >>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android >>> >>> Whatever lands in the Android build should land across all targets at >>> the platform level. The tests should also be integrated into the build >>> so that people can run them manually. >>> >>> I think the first 3 BPs should be joined by other BPs that track >>> health checks on the remaining targets. >>> >>> It looks like >>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android >>> can be integrated into the build. We can put together a new git for >>> it. Does: >>> >>> git://android.git.linaro.org/test/linaro/android/tema.git >>> >>> sound good? >>> >>> >>> > BR >>> > >>> > /Chi Thu >>> > >>> > On 23 March 2012 11:56, Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> On 23 March 2012 12:51, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Paul Larson wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Le.chi Thu <[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Here is the blueprints I would like to work with in next cycle and >>> >>>> > the >>> >>>> > highest first >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > * health-check-job-vexpress (very small task) >>> >>>> > * Include STE kernel test suite in LAVA and CI >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> The above two are good ones, I know the STE kernel suite has some >>> >>>> issues to >>> >>>> sort out wrt building though. >>> >>> >>> >>> Do we already have a blueprint with details about inclusion of the STE >>> >>> test suite in the backlog? in particular what is this "building" >>> >>> problem about... >>> >> >>> >> Here's the blueprint: >>> >> >>> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Zach Pfeffer >>> Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams >>> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs >>> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro >>> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog >> >> -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
