Apparently you can actually inspect the ui, look for text in it, etc. rather than just taking screenshots and comparing them.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer <[email protected]>wrote: > I think I'd rather just focus on monkey runner stuff. Chi Thu, what > doe TEMA give us that Monkey runner doesn't? > > On 28 March 2012 07:05, Le.chi Thu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I will talk with you about the tema. > > > > BR > > > > /Chi Thu > > > > On 27 March 2012 22:07, Paul Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Zach, I think the main thing we were looking for feedback from you > on is > >> this tema test, and whether you consider it to be useful beyond what > >> monkeyrunner already provides. There seems to be some overlap. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Zach Pfeffer <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 23 March 2012 08:07, Le.chi Thu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > sorry not include the link to blueprints. > >>> > > >>> > Here they are : > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/manually-health-check > >>> > > >>> > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite > >>> > > >>> > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/health-check-job-vexpress > >>> > > >>> > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android > >>> > >>> Whatever lands in the Android build should land across all targets at > >>> the platform level. The tests should also be integrated into the build > >>> so that people can run them manually. > >>> > >>> I think the first 3 BPs should be joined by other BPs that track > >>> health checks on the remaining targets. > >>> > >>> It looks like > >>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android > >>> can be integrated into the build. We can put together a new git for > >>> it. Does: > >>> > >>> git://android.git.linaro.org/test/linaro/android/tema.git > >>> > >>> sound good? > >>> > >>> > >>> > BR > >>> > > >>> > /Chi Thu > >>> > > >>> > On 23 March 2012 11:56, Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >> On 23 March 2012 12:51, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Paul Larson wrote: > >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Le.chi Thu < > [email protected]> > >>> >>>> wrote: > >>> >>>> > Here is the blueprints I would like to work with in next cycle > and > >>> >>>> > the > >>> >>>> > highest first > >>> >>>> > > >>> >>>> > * health-check-job-vexpress (very small task) > >>> >>>> > * Include STE kernel test suite in LAVA and CI > >>> >>>> > > >>> >>>> The above two are good ones, I know the STE kernel suite has some > >>> >>>> issues to > >>> >>>> sort out wrt building though. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Do we already have a blueprint with details about inclusion of the > STE > >>> >>> test suite in the backlog? in particular what is this "building" > >>> >>> problem about... > >>> >> > >>> >> Here's the blueprint: > >>> >> > >>> >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Zach Pfeffer > >>> Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams > >>> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > >>> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro > >>> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog > >> > >> > > > > -- > Zach Pfeffer > Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog >
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
