On 12-06-20 10:34 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
On 06/20/2012 12:01 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
cc LAVA mailing list.
On 20 June 2012 06:19, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Hey Andy,
During our call with ARM (invite on the way), the fact that LAVA has a
network dependency came up again.
Could you expand on the network dependency issue?
Filing a bug is even better.
We also have an issue with Connectivity Manager testing. Is there
anything that can be done in
12.07 (SD mux) to get over this?
I don't think the SD mux will be available or deployed in 12.07, so we
have to think about this another way.
I think the "black box" idea we spoke about at Connect might be the path
to solve this. For those who weren't at the bar at midnight in Hong
Kong: The "black box" idea is a change to how LAVA would run tests.
Instead of having the LAVA dispatcher drive everything host side, we'd
boot into a test image, let it do stuff, pull files from a know
partition, analyze and report results.
If we were to do that, decisions like networking would be completely up
to you(the test image). This concept works best with an SD-mux set up.
However, it could work with our master images also.
I still worry 12.07 might be a little ambitious for such a fundamental
change, but I think we should discuss.
Agreed, it is a little too ambitious. Might be better to add it as a
second mode of operation LAVA supports, and indicate the mode in the job
JSON.
Scott
-andy
_______________________________________________
linaro-android mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
--
Scott Bambrough
Technical Director, Member Services
Linaro Ltd.
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
