On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Paul Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > If I had to guess, I'd say that the network dependency issue ARM is talking > about is the fact that we install an image over the wire, and that they > probably want to do bare metal testing on systems that may not even have > network support at all. I know that they've mentioned such things in the > past, and the response has basically been that we chose this method of > deployment based on the boards we care about testing. If they need to > deploy things in a different way (usb, jtag, carrier pigeons...) a different > deployment handler would need to be written to cover that. >
Yes, we need networking for master image, but for android we also need it for the TARGET (adb) ... thats a pretty high requirement for the market we aim at :). So yes, LAVAv2 will (have to) cover blackbox testing and that is part of phase 1 or 2 of it which could mean Q3 or Q4 according to the roadmap I currently have in my mind. -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
