On 19 September 2012 07:11, Loïc Minier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012, Dave Pigott wrote: >> Device Type Instances >> vexpress-a5 vexpress-a5-01 >> vexpress-a9 vexpress-a9-01 >> vexpress-tc2 vexpress-tc2-01 >> vexpress-tc2-02 >> vexpress-tc2-03 >> vexpress-tc2-04 >> >> Notes: >> * vexpress-tc2-01 will remain offline for external user testing. I'm >> thinking that perhaps we should switch this around and make that tc2-04 and >> then remove it from the list to make it tidier > > Yes; note that one of the TC2 was actually meant to be reserved to TCWG, > with remote access, but we currently have nobody to set it up as they > desire (custom kernel with PM features turned off). If the TCWG frees > resources to pick this up, they'll grab one of these TC2 boards.
Sorry to vector off a bit, but we could probably get it set up for them. We'd also like a TC2 box we could run code on. >> * I have one spare a9 tile and a mother board. Does anyone want me to put >> this in a new motherboard and bring a second a9 online? > > Makes sense; apparently the new motherboard are slightly different, is > it easy to tell them apart? We should make sure that people working on > advanced tiles (e.g. TC2 or later) get the very latest baseboard to > avoid any incompatibilities. IIUC all baseboards and daughterboards are > compatible, but best to avoid that risk. > > -- > Loïc Minier -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
