On 12-09-19 04:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 19 September 2012 07:11, Loïc Minier <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012, Dave Pigott wrote:
Device Type Instances vexpress-a5 vexpress-a5-01 vexpress-a9
vexpress-a9-01 vexpress-tc2 vexpress-tc2-01 vexpress-tc2-02
vexpress-tc2-03 vexpress-tc2-04
Notes: * vexpress-tc2-01 will remain offline for external user
testing. I'm thinking that perhaps we should switch this around
and make that tc2-04 and then remove it from the list to make it
tidier
This seems tidier to me as well.
Yes; note that one of the TC2 was actually meant to be reserved to
TCWG, with remote access, but we currently have nobody to set it up
as they desire (custom kernel with PM features turned off). If the
TCWG frees resources to pick this up, they'll grab one of these TC2
boards.
Sorry to vector off a bit, but we could probably get it set up for
them. We'd also like a TC2 box we could run code on.
We need to be careful here. The board loan agreement and ARM are very
specific about having a box available for general porting. These boxes
are for Linaro use only, to support Linaro work. They are not for
general member use. ARM sells these to members, and doesn't want sales
circumvented in this manner. It was one of the main sticking points in
the board loan agreement negotiation AFAIK; ARM was insistent.
I'm not suggesting this is what anyone has planned to do, but please do
keep it in mind when evaluating requests to run jobs or work on the board.
* I have one spare a9 tile and a mother board. Does anyone want
me to put this in a new motherboard and bring a second a9
online?
Seems reasonable if we have the hardware and you have the time.
Scott
--
Scott Bambrough
Technical Director, Member Services
Linaro Ltd.
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
