On 11/20/2012 08:52 AM, Dave Pigott wrote:
On 20 Nov 2012, at 14:49, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote:
+Mark,Scott (as well)
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Alexander Sack <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Dave Pigott
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
David Zinman contacted me with an urgent request. Apparently
Mathieu's TC2 is playing up and he has an urgent need for it.
Could we liberate one from the lab while Mathieu returns it,
and then deal with either fixing it (if it's the motherboard, I
have a spare; if it's the tile, we'll get ARM to swap it out)?
Looking at the TC2 load, it's not so bad that we're going to
block on it.
will there be redundancy left in the lab if we take one TC2 out?
No, and that's why I'm sending this out, because I don't want to do
this without serious consideration. At present we have four TC2s in
the lab, but only two of them are available to LAVA, because the
other two are dedicated as hack boxes for Vishal and Naresh on their
IKS and MP work. If we do this, then we will only have one online in
LAVA.
It sounds like its too important not to ship one of our TC2's to
Mathieu. That will still leave our lab with 3 TC's, 2 for manual hackbox
usage and 1 for LAVA. If this allocation doesn't work, then we can move
one of the hackboxes into LAVA and let Naresh and Vishal negotiate time
sharing.
NOTE: I suspect if the demand for automated LAVA usage increases, then
Naresh's demand for manual testing would be decreasing.
-andy
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
