Hello Dave: Can you please send me the S/N for the VE and TC2 so I update my list.
I talked to Mathieu and he will send out an e-mail outlining what was wrong with the board. After that, I will talk to Andrew Pickard to process the replacement, which will go back into LAVA. Arwen: I will deal with Dave on this and make sure it is properly tracked. anmar On 20 November 2012 11:38, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds fine. Let's ensure that mpoirier gets a replacement TC2 and > that that is routed to cambridge in turn. CCed Anmar for that. > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 11/20/2012 08:52 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 20 Nov 2012, at 14:49, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +Mark,Scott (as well) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Dave Pigott >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> David Zinman contacted me with an urgent request. Apparently >>>>>> Mathieu's TC2 is playing up and he has an urgent need for it. >>>>>> Could we liberate one from the lab while Mathieu returns it, >>>>>> and then deal with either fixing it (if it's the motherboard, I >>>>>> have a spare; if it's the tile, we'll get ARM to swap it out)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at the TC2 load, it's not so bad that we're going to >>>>>> block on it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> will there be redundancy left in the lab if we take one TC2 out? >>> >>> >>> No, and that's why I'm sending this out, because I don't want to do >>> this without serious consideration. At present we have four TC2s in >>> the lab, but only two of them are available to LAVA, because the >>> other two are dedicated as hack boxes for Vishal and Naresh on their >>> IKS and MP work. If we do this, then we will only have one online in >>> LAVA. >> >> >> It sounds like its too important not to ship one of our TC2's to Mathieu. >> That will still leave our lab with 3 TC's, 2 for manual hackbox usage and 1 >> for LAVA. If this allocation doesn't work, then we can move one of the >> hackboxes into LAVA and let Naresh and Vishal negotiate time sharing. >> >> NOTE: I suspect if the demand for automated LAVA usage increases, then >> Naresh's demand for manual testing would be decreasing. >> >> -andy > > > > -- > Alexander Sack > Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams > http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
