On 9 Jan 2013, at 02:18, Michael Hudson-Doyle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dave Pigott <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>>> OK.  I'd still like to have a system ready to go as a standby in case
>>> the upgrade implodes so that we can continue to accept jobs at least.
>> 
>> Do you want me to create a cloud node called something like
>> control-backup? I widened the pool of public IPs for the cloud
>> yesterday to add 192.168.0.x so this *should* work - the reason we
>> were hitting the stops before was that we had run out of public
>> floating IPs. As luck would have it the private pool has always been
>> wide enough, because I had planned for when we widened the IP address
>> space. And just to reassure you: dnsmasq is configured to never serve
>> from the 192.168.0.x address range.
> 
> Hm.  I guess that makes sense, yes -- can you do that tomorrow?
> 
> Cheers,
> mwh

OK. Instance created. Just doing all the config. However, there's something 
odd. We've run out of RAM quota, although the total amount  we've used isn't 
anywhere near the total available. I suspect (but don't know yet) that this is 
due to the number of instances running on individual nodes. I may need to 
update and reboot the cloud. :(

The RAM I could allocate to control-backup was only 2GB. Hope it's enough.

Dave
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to