On 9 Jan 2013, at 09:22, Dave Pigott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 9 Jan 2013, at 02:18, Michael Hudson-Doyle <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dave Pigott <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> OK. I'd still like to have a system ready to go as a standby in case >>>> the upgrade implodes so that we can continue to accept jobs at least. >>> >>> Do you want me to create a cloud node called something like >>> control-backup? I widened the pool of public IPs for the cloud >>> yesterday to add 192.168.0.x so this *should* work - the reason we >>> were hitting the stops before was that we had run out of public >>> floating IPs. As luck would have it the private pool has always been >>> wide enough, because I had planned for when we widened the IP address >>> space. And just to reassure you: dnsmasq is configured to never serve >>> from the 192.168.0.x address range. >> >> Hm. I guess that makes sense, yes -- can you do that tomorrow? >> >> Cheers, >> mwh > > OK. Instance created. Just doing all the config. However, there's something > odd. We've run out of RAM quota, although the total amount we've used isn't > anywhere near the total available. I suspect (but don't know yet) that this > is due to the number of instances running on individual nodes. I may need to > update and reboot the cloud. :( > > The RAM I could allocate to control-backup was only 2GB. Hope it's enough. > > Dave All configured. LAVA team have ssh and sudo. Thanks Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
