Hello, On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:45:07 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
[] > I know that Matt tried to do bunch of builds and they were failing by > one reason or another, the best thing I can do besides re-enabling > daily builds is to launch build of a previous known-good revision on > couple of boards in parallel (to insure against possible hw issues of > a particular board). Hope that will re-establish baseline, so let's > check the builds on Monday. Ok, so here're these 2 builds: gcc-4.8~svn196132 panda-es02 https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/50993 panda-es05 https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/50994 #50993 went well. #50994 midway in compilation started to get invalid data (grep for "is not valid in preprocessor expressions"), then got kernel fault, then got caught in reboot loop, apparently due to: [ 6.631256] thermal_init_thermal_state: Getting initial temp for cpu domain [ 6.638702] thermal_request_temp [ 6.642150] omap_fatal_zone:FATAL ZONE (hot spot temp: 128490) - all these behaviors were seen by me before (actually, previously, I didn't see such explicit messages from kernel that it's a thermal faults). So, CBuild/LAVA can do (successful) builds, but some builds fail due to thermal issues. Actually, let me load up all boards with the same build now, towards assessing thermal failure rate more scientifically. I'm not sure what's wrong with Matt's Fri builds, none of which succeeded, will look into that on Mon. -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
