Hi Basil, I'm not ignoring you on this issue, I just don't have a clue how to go about doing that. Someone in the LAVA team might be able to help, but we're all very busy this week :-O
Regards, Ryan. On 28 October 2013 14:38, Basil Eljuse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tyler / Fathi / Ryan, > > > > Hope one of you would be able to help us out with this question. > > > > Dean has got a local LAVA instance setup at our end for the 64-bit Base > model testing based on the deployment from your end. On our live setup we > had an issue w.r.t database upgrade which Dean has addressed in a separate > thread. It would be good if we could get help in resolving that issue. > > > > We have got now demonstrated LAVA runs on AEMv8 , Cortex_Base_Model4x4 and > Cortex_Base_Model1x1 following Linaro instructions. > > > > One of the key usecases we have is for the ability to swap out the kernel or > the firmware binaries from previously released hardware pack, and test the > release candidate binaries using LAVA setup. > > > > Q:: Can you advice how best to go about within LAVA setup to swap out the > contents of the hardware pack for testing? > > > > When we did the OOB testing we could see that the hardware pack contents get > eventually unpacked to a ‘fastmodel’ folder. > > > > In LAVA I can see some logs referring to > > > > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/rootfs/boot/Image-3.12.0-1-linaro-vexpress64' -> > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/Image-3.12.0-1-linaro-vexpress64' > > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/fvp/BL2_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' -> > `/srv/lava/instances/fastmodel-trial/var/www/lava-server/images/tmpb9uqba/BL2_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' > > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/fvp/BL2_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' -> > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/BL2_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' > > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/fvp/BL31_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' -> > `/srv/lava/instances/fastmodel-trial/var/www/lava-server/images/tmpb9uqba/BL31_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' > > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/fvp/BL31_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' -> > `/tmp/tmpilF6yY/boot-disc/BL31_AP_Trusted_RAM.bin' > > > > Can you help us decipher these? > > > > Is there an option where somehow I can specify via test definition, a > location for the binaries which have to be replaced in the hw-pack ‘unpacked > location’? > > > > Please let us know a suggested way forward in this case? > > > > Thanks > > Basil Eljuse… > > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, > Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 > ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, > Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
