I think that needs some nuance.
The Town of Lincoln ons the land.
The disposition of the buildings is another matter.
------
Sara Mattes




> On Nov 16, 2022, at 6:08 PM, Jennifer Saffran <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> FYI: The Town of Lincoln no longer owns the DeCordova. The Trustees of the 
> Reservation are the owners now.
> 
>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 5:57 PM, ROY HARVEY <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Appendix D (Program Schedule Matrix) and Appendix O (A day in the life of 
>> the Lincoln CC, excerpted below) of the 2018 report by the architects show 
>> the many anticipated uses of the CC spaces throughout the day.  Utilization 
>> of these spaces reaches high levels. 
>> 
>> Many activities would greatly benefit from new, purpose-built spaces.  
>> However, some of the activities appear to be doable in existing buildings 
>> (especially if they don't need COAHS/PRD staff to lead or supervise). These 
>> include foreign language conversation, chess club, bridge, and others.  (I 
>> have not attended any of these so am not aware of particular needs.)
>> 
>> Sorry if this has already been asked or answered, but can some of the 
>> program activities use other, existing spaces, e.g., the school, Hartwell 
>> main building and pods, Bemis, Pierce House, Library, DeCordova, etc, and 
>> reduce the square footage needed in the CC? 
>> 
>> Also, was cost an input to (that is, a constraint on) the architect's 
>> process, or are estimated costs outputs of the process?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Roy Harvey
>> 
>> <image.png>
>>> On 11/16/2022 4:50 PM Allen Vander Meulen <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have no doubt the CCBC and Selectboard are well aware there is 
>>> considerable concern over the costs of the Community Center project - more 
>>> than enough to kill the project if costs are too high. And I know they do 
>>> not want to waste time designing a facility that will never be built. I 
>>> think we can and should trust them to be good stewards of the town’s 
>>> available funds.
>>> 
>>> Also, given that this is the early stages of the project, it is far better 
>>> - from a project management point of view - to not overly-constrain the 
>>> process. We need to see what the costs of building the Community Center we 
>>> want / need really are, and how various options will affect that cost. A 
>>> similar approach was done for the school project, resulting in three 
>>> options (at various price points) being presented to the town for a vote.
>>> 
>>> I am certain the CCBC will pursue a similar strategy. So there is no need 
>>> to set a “cap” at this time; and in my opinion doing so will compromise the 
>>> end result in ways that no one will be happy with.
>>> 
>>> - Allen Vander Meulen
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 16:11, Sara Mattes <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Rob, et al.
>>>> We could vote for the money, with a caveat-that the next step include a 
>>>> cap on total costs.
>>>> Bob Mason has suggested a $15 million cap as that was the top end of the 
>>>> projected costs when we last visited numbers, and was a number that many, 
>>>> at the time were comfortable with.
>>>> 
>>>> Without such caveat, there is no guarantee that the design iterations will 
>>>> come anywhere close to that figure.
>>>> 
>>>> I suspect, like most, am bound by a budget/limit on what I can expend on 
>>>> construction, remodeling and/or renovations in my own home.
>>>> Perhaps we can do that, as a town too.
>>>> 
>>>> Your offer to lead fundraising is laudable, but we would need to raise $10 
>>>> million in order to bring the price tag back to what had been seen has the 
>>>> upper limit.
>>>> Would we old off voting on a bond until that goal was reached.
>>>> I am not sure how this could work.
>>>> 
>>>> If we do not, we continue to challenge the budgets of many and create a 
>>>> climate that limits opportunities for economic diversity in our community.
>>>> If we are committed to diversity, as we espouse to be, we must walk our 
>>>> talk, have our actions match our words, and budget accordingly.
>>>> 
>>>> I look forward to hearing more from others tonight.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sara
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------
>>>> Sara Mattes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 3:50 PM, Rob <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> From what I heard Jonathan Dwyer say last night, at this point there are 
>>>>> NO budgets, and there are no final plans for the Community Center. The 
>>>>> $325K is intended to hire an outside architect to work with the CCBC to 
>>>>> review the options that were worked out from 2018, and to ALSO 
>>>>> add/subtract features and consider learnings we’ve had over the last 3 
>>>>> years, and to consider new information (cost, etc…) to come up with a 
>>>>> plan to present to the town again at the next town meeting. Ideally it 
>>>>> would be something we could vote on to continue the process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A “no” vote for this money prevents Lincoln from having the benefit of an 
>>>>> (outside) expert to come up with a new plan that fits with post-COVID 
>>>>> learnings and today’s financial reality and stops the process in its 
>>>>> tracks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I for one will vote to support the town’s request to spend this money on 
>>>>> assessing the 2018 plans to see if they are a fit for 2023 and beyond. I 
>>>>> will vote again if and when asked for more funds for further studies 
>>>>> and/or moving forward with a Community Center once we have more 
>>>>> information gathered by these outside experts and town staff and 
>>>>> volunteers.       
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am also eager to volunteer to help raise private funds to defray any 
>>>>> tax burden the community center might incur.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rob Stringer
>>>>> 15 Todd Pond
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>>>> Browse the archives at 
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to