The committee has done fantastic work and looked at alternatives in the past and has decided to move forward with these.  I agree having this facility will be nice but if people can’t afford to live in this town what’s the point.  

We are not building any new housing to expand our tax base or low income housing so building this will raise taxes and keep pricing people out of this great town.  

Adam M Hogue

On Nov 17, 2022, at 9:32 AM, Michael Dembowski <[email protected]> wrote:



The Town’s dialogue regarding the proposed Community Center is engaging, healthy and vital. However, many of the comments being expressed would be made no matter what the budget – the initial $10-15M estimated cost or the current COVID and inflationary driven $25M. Many townspeople simply don’t want to see additional tax increases, don’t know fully the program needs and current condition of the COA, Recreation Department and LEAP facilities or don’t know of the diligent work of the Community Center Committees that date back to 2012. Many of the suggestions and recommendations being made- whether thinking ‘out of the box’ or being ‘prudent and cost conscious’ seem to be out of step with the process, uninformed by the work completed to date or are more direct in wanting to prematurely shut down further town-wide consideration of a Community Center.

I am surprised at the apparent lack of good faith that those who have been directing this project to date have not thought of – and heard – and evaluated each suggestion offered. Does no one think that the Community Center Committees have not examined Bemis and Pierce Hall?, not looked at concurrent uses with the school programs?, not researched relevant program use data and benchmarking from other towns?, not been mindful of costs, budgetary constraints and the community’s reception to property tax increases?- especially following the school project???

Voting YES on the next week’s ballot only approves limited monies for the further development of the proposed Community Center – a process that I would expect would be as transparent and participatory as the school project had been- incorporating the myriad voices and concerns now being expressed while also allowing for the possibility of securing private funds to help offset any future potential tax increase.

We are all privileged to live in this remarkable town – but privilege should prompt responsibility. Lincoln’s uniqueness is inextricably intertwined with its large sized properties, extensive conservation lands, farms and network of trails- all of which are universally appreciated and valued. However – the same lack of population and housing density can make Lincoln an extremely challenging place to live well and thrive in as we age – as we ALL age.

The Community Center Project embodies a VISION that is lost in much of the current dialogue of costs, budgets and potential taxes – one that should be considered in the context of wanting Lincoln to be a community that has the amenities, facilities and services that make it a desirable and more manageable town to live in for all of one’s life.

 

Michael Dembowski

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to