Wait, is this true? In order to vote on Dec 2nd we need to be registered to vote on ZONING or just need to be a registered voter in Lincoln?
Please clarify? Thank you, Paula Robinson 617.981.1945 > On Nov 24, 2023, at 8:51 AM, Christi Damico <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is it true that to vote on December 2, a resident must be registered for > this specific vote only? > > That seems shady. I can understand the need to register to vote in the Town > but why register AGAIN for this specific voting opportunity? I’ve never > heard of such a thing. > > My mom would like to vote. She has been very occupied with other big issues. > I don’t think she should be disenfranchised from voting because of this? > She has been registered to vote in this Town and is a Lincoln resident since > 1975. > > Christi Damico > Lincoln/WA > >> On Nov 24, 2023, at 1:29 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Send Lincoln mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Lincoln digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Danielle Pierce) >> 2. deCordova I Store Thanksgiving Weekend Shopping Hours >> (Mary Balogh) >> 3. Re: How many housing units at Lincoln Station? (Margaret Olson) >> 4. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Andy Wang) >> 5. Re: How many housing units at Lincoln Station? >> (?Sarah Postlethwait) >> 6. Re: Radical change in Lincoln (Sara Mattes) >> 7. FS: For Sale for BBI: $950 Correia Art Glass "Lilac and Black >> Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? diameter, handmade, signed, $295!! >> (Joanna Owen Schmergel) >> 8. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Scott Clary) >> 9. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (V Saleme) >> 10. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Donald Fonseca) >> 11. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Sara Mattes) >> 12. FS: For Sale for BBI: Correia Art Glass perfume bottle with >> top, 6? tall, handmade & signed $65 (Joanna Owen Schmergel) >> 13. December Happenings at the Lincoln Public Library (Ran Cronin) >> 14. Free stone dust (Stephen Dirrane) >> 15. What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Edward Young) >> 16. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? >> (Karla Gravis) >> 17. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Andy Wang) >> 18. Posting for teenager: kids books for sale (Cris Ratiner) >> 19. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Anne Warner) >> 20. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Terri) >> 21. For Sale: Men?s MOTO snowboard boots size 11.5. Very good >> condition. $40 (Richard Theriault) >> 22. non-turkey Thanksgiving (Bijoy Misra) >> 23. For Decades, Southern States Considered Thanksgiving an Act >> of Northern Aggression (Sara Mattes) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:21:03 -0400 >> From: Danielle Pierce <[email protected]> >> To: John Mendelson <[email protected]> >> Cc: LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: >> <CAFdo4aCtSojX=voqukmm+a2k-fgjzxj-h8yeyaa+8rbgdns...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> With all due respect, this is a huge issue that is being voted on very >> soon. Moreover, there seem to be a lot of things that are only now being >> discovered. If people want to talk, they should. If people don?t want to >> talk or listen, they shouldn?t. But trying to silence people at this point >> in the process sounds huge alarm bells. >> >> Danielle Pierce >> >> >> (Sent from my phone; apologies for formatting issues) >> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 9:49 PM John Mendelson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> We are all lucky to live here. Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA >>> chatter on Lincoln Talk? >>> >>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it. >>> >>> John >>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ >>> . >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231122/b8b9d054/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:30:00 -0500 >> From: Mary Balogh <[email protected]> >> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] deCordova I Store Thanksgiving Weekend Shopping >> Hours >> Message-ID: >> <cajmpjvnwq3oc9uusa-os-ymjgmfzmdckwzkuatph9mfywjh...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> HAPPY THANKSGIVING to you from the deCordova Store! >> Our Thanksgiving weekend hours are: >> >> *FRIDAY: 10am - 4pm* *GREEN FRIDAY:* *Take the **Gratitude and Awe Family >> Hike *https://thetrustees.org/event/85855/*, and then stop by the store to >> see what's new for the holidays!* >> *SATURDAY: 10am - 5pm* *SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY - Shop small, shop local, >> shop at a not-for-profit!* >> *SUNDAY: 10am - 5pm*. *MUSEUM STORE SUNDAY** - Members double their store >> discount to 20%!* >> >> >> [image: image.png] >> >> The Trustees | *deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum* >> 51 Sandy Pond Road? |? Lincoln, MA 01773 >> 781.259.8692 Store >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/58c37b6a/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: image.png >> Type: image/png >> Size: 4471 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/58c37b6a/attachment-0001.png> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:48:07 -0500 >> From: Margaret Olson <[email protected]> >> To: ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]> >> Cc: Laurie Gray <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] How many housing units at Lincoln Station? >> Message-ID: >> <cahqz9n3vl003b9-o74heyaz90voexydelcz+vw-91ekv6rt...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Yes, the current draft permits additional height by special permit. All I >> was trying to say is that if it?s not in the zoning we can?t do it. >> >> Please note that this is an early incomplete draft. Once it is a complete >> draft there will be public hearings at which citizens can give feedback >> before it is up for the vote at town meeting. >> >> Generally there is a trade off between wiggle room in the form of special >> permits and specificity. If the zoning is more specific both the town and >> the applicant know exactly what will and will not be permitted. If there is >> a special permit the town (and neighbors) have negotiating power. >> >> Since we currently have a working document you will see places where both >> the specific and the special permit are written in. This is an artifact of >> the drafting process. There is reason we haven?t published the working >> draft: it?s hard to follow in it?s current state. >> >> Margaret >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:52 PM ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The current bylaw draft states ?additional Height, Stories, and Density >>> may be allowed by a Special Permit granted by the Planning board.? >>> >>> This seems to directly contradict what you are saying. >>> >>> >>> If the planning board is unable to allow by special permit more than 3 >>> stories, more than 42? or more than 25 UPA?. why is this included in the >>> current draft of the village center bylaws? >>> >>> Sarah Postlethwait >>> >>> Lewis Street >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:46?PM Margaret Olson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Note: neither the RLF nor Civico can "ask the planning board" to approve >>>> anything that is not permitted in the zoning. It is the zoning you will be >>>> voting on in March. As Sarah notes, the HCA zoning by-law is currently an >>>> incomplete working draft. There will be multiple public hearings before the >>>> March town meeting on the zoning, and once the draft is somewhat coherent >>>> it will be published on the town website. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ?On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29?PM ??Sarah Postlethwait?? <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:? >>>> >>>>> This is a really great approach to the mall debate, and I think those of >>>>> us who are especially concerned about the mall development would embrace >>>>> an >>>>> incremental rezoning to see what the town infrastructure is able to >>>>> handle. >>>>> Unfortunately, it sounds like the developer who is in talks with the owner >>>>> of the mall, the RLF, does not want anything less than 25 UPA to be >>>>> allowed >>>>> at this time. >>>>> >>>>> Some history: >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> Option C, D1, D2 & D3 all include the RLF/mall, Dohertys garage and 3 >>>>> town owned parcels/commuter lots, a total of 7.1 acres are being proposed >>>>> in >>>>> the village center to be rezoned at 25 units per acre. >>>>> >>>>> 125 units would be allowed to be developed on the non town owned >>>>> parcels. >>>>> >>>>> 53 additional units could be built on the town owned parcels. >>>>> >>>>> Oriole landing has 60 units for reference >>>>> >>>>> And there are 2078 units in Lincoln currently without counting Hanscom. >>>>> >>>>> Option E asks the town to bring the mall development as a separate >>>>> matter to town meeting. It also allows 144 additional units in south >>>>> Lincoln to be built on top of what is already built in this area. >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> At the 11/8 HCAWG morning meeting, the RLF representative of the HCAWG >>>>> seemed to state that it?s difficult to fit even 85 units on their 4 acres >>>>> while keeping Donelans and the Post office, as they have promised to do. >>>>> >>>>> I asked the HCAWG and the RLF rep at this meeting why they would not >>>>> consider reducing the UPA (units per acre) to 15 at the mall instead of 25 >>>>> UPA. That would allow for 60 units on the RLF portion alone, and 107 >>>>> units in the entire Village district- plus all of what was being proposed >>>>> in the rest of Options C-D3. If they wanted more in the future it could be >>>>> taken to town meeting (this seems to be what you are proposing now?) >>>>> >>>>> The RLF rep stated that ?it would be the difference between a >>>>> development happening and no development happening?. Implying that the >>>>> developer they are working with would not accept less than 25 UPA, even if >>>>> they can?t build that many units now, and they would walk away and nothing >>>>> would get built. >>>>> >>>>> Civico has expressed its need for 25 UPA to redevelop the RLF portion of >>>>> the mall (100 units). From the HCAWG SOTT slide deck: ?RLF is working >>>>> with a developer known to and trusted by the Town: CIVICO? and ?Based on >>>>> current analysis, a minimum of 25 units/acre is needed for a financially >>>>> viable project? >>>>> >>>>> In addition to the 100 units being proposed at the mall, TCB (owners of >>>>> Lincoln Woods) is in negotiations with the town for development on the >>>>> large commuter lot (discussed during the 11/20 Planning board meeting). >>>>> >>>>> All HCAWG presentations to date have stated that the tallest building >>>>> allowed would be 42? and 3 stories at the mall. However, the zoning bylaw >>>>> draft discussed 11/20 actually allowed 48? and 4 stories by right for any >>>>> buildings 100? away from the Lincoln road. After some push back, this was >>>>> adjusted to 42? and 3 stories by right and anything higher than 42? or >>>>> denser than 25UPA could be permitted by Planning Board Approval. (See >>>>> photo >>>>> below) >>>>> >>>>> And the bylaw draft also stated ?More requirements may be inserted here >>>>> once a discussion with Andrew Consigli takes place?. Andrew Consigli is >>>>> the owner of Civico development. >>>>> >>>>> Obviously this is just a draft of the proposed bylaws and can be >>>>> adjusted even further in the future- but it?s a perfect example of >>>>> discussions that are happening out of public eye with the developers and >>>>> what they intend to ask the planning board to build once one of the >>>>> proposed options are passed at town meeting. >>>>> >>>>> Many people who are in support of Option E are also fully in support of >>>>> development at the mall. We just want thoughtful, controlled development >>>>> that isn?t too much for our town infrastructure to handle. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Postlethwait >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:19?AM Laurie Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I still feel relatively new to this HCA debate, but in the past few >>>>>> weeks I have been following the debate closely as I am realizing how >>>>>> important it is for the future of our town. I have wondered if people >>>>>> appearing to be on opposite sides of the debate are actually closer >>>>>> together than it seems. A question I have for Lincoln talk and the >>>>>> greater >>>>>> community is: how many additional housing units do we want in Lincoln >>>>>> station? I think many agree we need additional housing in the Lincoln >>>>>> Station area but it is unclear to me if people have widely different >>>>>> views >>>>>> on how much housing. >>>>>> To me, it is hard to know what life would be like in Lincoln with more >>>>>> housing units at the station, so I am in favor of an incremental >>>>>> approach, >>>>>> where we can try out some number of units first and then make further >>>>>> decisions at a later point. But what is this number and how do we arrive >>>>>> at this number? What number is high enough to feel "substantial" but not >>>>>> so high that we destroy quality of life? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>> >>>>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: image_123650291.JPG >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 261039 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.jpe> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: 1FB3E4C7-58AC-4104-809C-1030CA33F30F.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 422928 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.jpeg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:16:21 -0500 >> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]> >> To: Edward Young <[email protected]> >> Cc: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >> project? >> Message-ID: >> <caefvrnh0-xvnwxyrdgykj2-hzbf-bjpcwasjdqqjm4zthwr...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as 'Estimated >> tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also for the FY23 >> Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of $17,488), so >> it will vary based on individual home prices. There is also the chart on >> the right of that same slide that provides details on the impact based on >> how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M, $20M, $25M) of a >> CC. I believe this chart was provided by FinCom. >> >> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are >> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the >> three designs. It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the >> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center. >> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your >> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g. >> >> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing >> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent. >> >> - Andy (not the FinCom one...) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected tax >>> impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently >>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s >>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact? is far LOWER >>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the proposals, >>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board >>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to $773 >>> increase,? depending on the size of the project. >>> >>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading >>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, on >>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of ?up >>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are >>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed >>> information. >>> >>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission >>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with >>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in >>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing. >>> >>> Edward Young >>> Bedford Road >>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ >>> . >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/44e4e16c/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:30:58 -0500 >> From: ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]> >> To: Margaret Olson <[email protected]> >> Cc: Laurie Gray <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] How many housing units at Lincoln Station? >> Message-ID: >> <CAH9ufVu-nio+sUdtmxMBNzfQ9GC=ak_hiqeridbtea7bxu7...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> With all due respect, >> >> If the town is voting on an option that is being advertised as 3 stories, >> 42? maximum, and 25 units an acre maximum- it should be impossible for >> anything higher or denser to be permitted unless by town meeting vote. This >> is what the town is expecting the bylaws to reflect, and what they are >> assuming when voting in a week on the proposed options. >> >> Furthermore, This ?wiggle room? clause was not included in every >> Subdistrict of the draft bylaws. It was only included in the village center >> portion. >> >> And if you look directly above it, a note about adjusting the draft bylaws >> based on the wishes of a developer, Andrew Consigli, is written in. >> >> It?s very clear that the developers want 4 story/48? buildings, and no lot >> coverage restrictions, and limited commercial and parking requirements. It >> is astonishing to me that we are handing it to them on a silver platter >> while telling the town a completely different story. Draft or not, these >> are very concerning points that the public should be aware of when being >> asked to unnecessarily include the Village Center into the HCA rezoning in >> a week at town meeting. >> >> Sarah Postlethwait >> >> Lewis St >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 7:48?AM Margaret Olson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, the current draft permits additional height by special permit. All I >>> was trying to say is that if it?s not in the zoning we can?t do it. >>> >>> Please note that this is an early incomplete draft. Once it is a complete >>> draft there will be public hearings at which citizens can give feedback >>> before it is up for the vote at town meeting. >>> >>> Generally there is a trade off between wiggle room in the form of special >>> permits and specificity. If the zoning is more specific both the town and >>> the applicant know exactly what will and will not be permitted. If there is >>> a special permit the town (and neighbors) have negotiating power. >>> >>> Since we currently have a working document you will see places where both >>> the specific and the special permit are written in. This is an artifact of >>> the drafting process. There is reason we haven?t published the working >>> draft: it?s hard to follow in it?s current state. >>> >>> Margaret >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:52 PM ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The current bylaw draft states ?additional Height, Stories, and Density >>>> may be allowed by a Special Permit granted by the Planning board.? >>>> >>>> This seems to directly contradict what you are saying. >>>> >>>> >>>> If the planning board is unable to allow by special permit more than 3 >>>> stories, more than 42? or more than 25 UPA?. why is this included in the >>>> current draft of the village center bylaws? >>>> >>>> Sarah Postlethwait >>>> >>>> Lewis Street >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:46?PM Margaret Olson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Note: neither the RLF nor Civico can "ask the planning board" to approve >>>>> anything that is not permitted in the zoning. It is the zoning you will be >>>>> voting on in March. As Sarah notes, the HCA zoning by-law is currently an >>>>> incomplete working draft. There will be multiple public hearings before >>>>> the >>>>> March town meeting on the zoning, and once the draft is somewhat coherent >>>>> it will be published on the town website. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ?On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29?PM ??Sarah Postlethwait?? < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:? >>>>> >>>>>> This is a really great approach to the mall debate, and I think those >>>>>> of us who are especially concerned about the mall development would >>>>>> embrace >>>>>> an incremental rezoning to see what the town infrastructure is able to >>>>>> handle. Unfortunately, it sounds like the developer who is in talks with >>>>>> the owner of the mall, the RLF, does not want anything less than 25 UPA >>>>>> to >>>>>> be allowed at this time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some history: >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> Option C, D1, D2 & D3 all include the RLF/mall, Dohertys garage and 3 >>>>>> town owned parcels/commuter lots, a total of 7.1 acres are being >>>>>> proposed in >>>>>> the village center to be rezoned at 25 units per acre. >>>>>> >>>>>> 125 units would be allowed to be developed on the non town owned >>>>>> parcels. >>>>>> >>>>>> 53 additional units could be built on the town owned parcels. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oriole landing has 60 units for reference >>>>>> >>>>>> And there are 2078 units in Lincoln currently without counting Hanscom. >>>>>> >>>>>> Option E asks the town to bring the mall development as a separate >>>>>> matter to town meeting. It also allows 144 additional units in south >>>>>> Lincoln to be built on top of what is already built in this area. >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> At the 11/8 HCAWG morning meeting, the RLF representative of the HCAWG >>>>>> seemed to state that it?s difficult to fit even 85 units on their 4 acres >>>>>> while keeping Donelans and the Post office, as they have promised to do. >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked the HCAWG and the RLF rep at this meeting why they would not >>>>>> consider reducing the UPA (units per acre) to 15 at the mall instead of >>>>>> 25 >>>>>> UPA. That would allow for 60 units on the RLF portion alone, and 107 >>>>>> units in the entire Village district- plus all of what was being proposed >>>>>> in the rest of Options C-D3. If they wanted more in the future it could >>>>>> be >>>>>> taken to town meeting (this seems to be what you are proposing now?) >>>>>> >>>>>> The RLF rep stated that ?it would be the difference between a >>>>>> development happening and no development happening?. Implying that the >>>>>> developer they are working with would not accept less than 25 UPA, even >>>>>> if >>>>>> they can?t build that many units now, and they would walk away and >>>>>> nothing >>>>>> would get built. >>>>>> >>>>>> Civico has expressed its need for 25 UPA to redevelop the RLF portion >>>>>> of the mall (100 units). From the HCAWG SOTT slide deck: ?RLF is >>>>>> working with a developer known to and trusted by the Town: CIVICO? and >>>>>> ?Based on current analysis, a minimum of 25 units/acre is needed for a >>>>>> financially viable project? >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition to the 100 units being proposed at the mall, TCB (owners of >>>>>> Lincoln Woods) is in negotiations with the town for development on the >>>>>> large commuter lot (discussed during the 11/20 Planning board meeting). >>>>>> >>>>>> All HCAWG presentations to date have stated that the tallest building >>>>>> allowed would be 42? and 3 stories at the mall. However, the zoning bylaw >>>>>> draft discussed 11/20 actually allowed 48? and 4 stories by right for any >>>>>> buildings 100? away from the Lincoln road. After some push back, this was >>>>>> adjusted to 42? and 3 stories by right and anything higher than 42? or >>>>>> denser than 25UPA could be permitted by Planning Board Approval. (See >>>>>> photo >>>>>> below) >>>>>> >>>>>> And the bylaw draft also stated ?More requirements may be inserted >>>>>> here once a discussion with Andrew Consigli takes place?. Andrew >>>>>> Consigli is the owner of Civico development. >>>>>> >>>>>> Obviously this is just a draft of the proposed bylaws and can be >>>>>> adjusted even further in the future- but it?s a perfect example of >>>>>> discussions that are happening out of public eye with the developers and >>>>>> what they intend to ask the planning board to build once one of the >>>>>> proposed options are passed at town meeting. >>>>>> >>>>>> Many people who are in support of Option E are also fully in support of >>>>>> development at the mall. We just want thoughtful, controlled development >>>>>> that isn?t too much for our town infrastructure to handle. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarah Postlethwait >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:19?AM Laurie Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I still feel relatively new to this HCA debate, but in the past few >>>>>>> weeks I have been following the debate closely as I am realizing how >>>>>>> important it is for the future of our town. I have wondered if people >>>>>>> appearing to be on opposite sides of the debate are actually closer >>>>>>> together than it seems. A question I have for Lincoln talk and the >>>>>>> greater >>>>>>> community is: how many additional housing units do we want in Lincoln >>>>>>> station? I think many agree we need additional housing in the Lincoln >>>>>>> Station area but it is unclear to me if people have widely different >>>>>>> views >>>>>>> on how much housing. >>>>>>> To me, it is hard to know what life would be like in Lincoln with more >>>>>>> housing units at the station, so I am in favor of an incremental >>>>>>> approach, >>>>>>> where we can try out some number of units first and then make further >>>>>>> decisions at a later point. But what is this number and how do we >>>>>>> arrive >>>>>>> at this number? What number is high enough to feel "substantial" but >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> so high that we destroy quality of life? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>> >>>>>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: image_123650291.JPG >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 261039 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.jpe> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: 1FB3E4C7-58AC-4104-809C-1030CA33F30F.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 422928 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.jpeg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:53:18 -0500 >> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]> >> To: Michael Dembowski <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], "Listserv, Listserv" >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Radical change in Lincoln >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/6f5bc27b/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Joanna Owen Schmergel <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] FS: For Sale for BBI: $950 Correia Art Glass >> "Lilac and Black Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? diameter, handmade, >> signed, $295!! >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Give the gift of?art this holiday season while supporting a worthy cause!? >> Easy, convenient?shopping right here in Lincoln!? >> Just 3?weeks left to shop before we shut down for the holidays!!? >> Now even MORE price?reductions!? >> We have a $40,000?goal by December 15th!!! >> We have $3,578?more to go!!? >> And we are STILL taking donations!!? >> See all of our available?listings here!? >> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh >> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, >> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups including >> Lincoln:? >> $950?Correia Art Glass "Lilac and Black Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? >> diameter, handmade, signed, $295!!? >> Finest art glass in the world!? >> Signed and in perfect condition!!? >>> From a very generous Lincoln donor >> Current retail: $950 >> Correia Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE 8620 - Priceless Galleries? >> >> | >> | >> | >> | | | >> >> | >> >> | >> | >> | | >> Correia Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE 8620 - Priceless Galleries >> >> LILAC AND BLACK IRIS Limited Edition: VASE 8620 Hand Signed: Yes and Dated >> Condition: Excellent Size 12 X 7 Provenance: New with COA. Certificate of >> Authenticity: Yes >> | | >> >> | >> >> | >> >> >> Our Price: $295!! >> >> Please see the link below for more photos: >> Correia Art Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE - arts & crafts - by owner - >> sale - craigslist? >> >> | >> | >> | >> | | | >> >> | >> >> | >> | >> | | >> Correia Art Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE - arts & crafts - by owner - >> sale - craigslist >> >> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, >> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups including >> Lincoln: $950 Correia Art Glass Lilac and... >> | | >> >> | >> >> | >> >> >> Please check out other artwork for sale on our?Facebook Marketplace page: >> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh >> >> Please call Joanna Schmergel to purchase?at?617-645-9059. Pickup at 18 >> Cerulean Way. ? >> >> *Giant dog is friendly? >> >> Serious inquiries only please.? >> >> ?All sales are final and all items are sold ?As Is?. >> >> These items are cross-posted for sale on other sites.? >> >> Payment in cash,?check or credit card on site >> >> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)?Boston Bridges Initiative >> has netted $36,422?since?January 2023. >> >> BBI?s Mission: >> Facilitate cultural exchange and promote meaningful social interaction >> between city and suburban families >> >> Learn more about the Boston Business Initiative here: >> >> https://bostonbridgesinitiative.org/ >> >> >> >> ?Warmly, >> Joanna Owen Schmergel? >> 617-645-9059 >> [email protected] >> pronouns: she/her/hers >> The Boston Bridges Initiative, a 501(c)(3) >> >> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) >> >> Boston Bridges Initiative? >> >> >> | >> | >> | >> | | | >> >> | >> >> | >> | >> | | >> Boston Bridges Initiative >> >> >> | | >> >> | >> >> | >> >> >> >> >> >> (The Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) program was >> originally started by the 501(c)(3) organization, Friends of Lincoln METCO, >> Lincoln METCO Coordinating Committee, in Lincoln, MA, and raised $170,000 >> from 2017 to 2022). >> >> As seen on?WBZ CBS News Boston: >> >> https://www.cbsnews.com/boston... >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/8da0ece4/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_4109.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 2917441 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/8da0ece4/attachment-0001.jpeg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 8 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:48:24 -0500 >> From: Scott Clary <[email protected]> >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: >> <CA+ZAMmfOVLgH+PLyC6bmNpa1d=gfrAnfu6hMAce=ryptpgy...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln! >> >> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button. >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Scott Clary >> 617-968-5769 >> >> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am >>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they >>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis. >>> >>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they >>> keep coming. Help admin! >>> >>> Donald >>> >>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf of John >>> Mendelson <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM >>> *To:* LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >>> >>> We are all lucky to live here. Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA >>> chatter on Lincoln Talk? >>> >>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it. >>> >>> John >>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ >>> . >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/b7c1747d/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:54:19 -0500 >> From: V Saleme <[email protected]> >> To: Scott Clary <[email protected]> >> Cc: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: >> <CAJDdKYHrwDWXCP=Tsrb31iPrSSsbe=mhkv1tfimickxb9wz...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Thanks and happy Thanksgiving to you as well Scott and everyone else! >> >> Vic >> >>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:48?AM Scott Clary <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln! >>> >>> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete >>> button. >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Scott Clary >>> 617-968-5769 >>> >>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am >>>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they >>>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis. >>>> >>>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they >>>> keep coming. Help admin! >>>> >>>> Donald >>>> >>>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf of John >>>> Mendelson <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM >>>> *To:* LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >>>> >>>> >>> We are all lucky to live here. Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA >>>> chatter on Lincoln Talk? >>>> >>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it. >>>> >>>> John >>>> -- >>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>> Browse the archives at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>> >>>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ >>> . >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/72e1b7e1/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 10 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:07:48 +0000 >> From: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> To: Scott Clary <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: >> >> <bl1pr14mb5046706c9c74be62d1c385c8ca...@bl1pr14mb5046.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >> >> You might be happily retired. Speak for yourself. 200 plus emails a week >> packed in with desirable emails becomes a full-time job. One suitable for a >> retired person sipping a cup of Joe in the morning. >> >> It always amuses me when people cannot see beyond themselves. On this >> Thanksgiving Day, not because you don?t have a problem, that does not mean >> that someone else does not. >> >> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >> ________________________________ >> From: Scott Clary <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 10:48:24 AM >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>; LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> >> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln! >> >> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button. >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Scott Clary >> 617-968-5769 >> >> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am overwhelmed. >> This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they should send >> multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis. >> >> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they >> keep coming. Help admin! >> >> Donald >> >> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >> ________________________________ >> From: Lincoln >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on >> behalf of John Mendelson >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM >> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> >> We are all lucky to live here. Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA >> chatter on Lincoln Talk? >> >> My in-box and peace of mind could use it. >> >> John >> -- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. >> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/d628ed5a/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 11 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:48:01 -0500 >> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]> >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Cc: Scott Clary <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/f2f9d11e/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 12 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Joanna Owen Schmergel <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] FS: For Sale for BBI: Correia Art Glass perfume >> bottle with top, 6? tall, handmade & signed $65 >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Give the gift of?art this holiday season while supporting a worthy cause!? >> Easy, convenient?shopping right here in Lincoln!? >> Just 3?weeks left to shop before we shut down for the holidays!!? >> Now even?MORE price?reductions!? >> We have a $40,000?goal by December 15th!!! >> We have $3,578?more to go!!? >> And we are STILL taking donations!!? >> See all of our available?listings here!? >> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh >> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, >> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups including >> Lincoln:? >> For the woman who has everything:? >> Correia Art Glass perfume bottle with top, 6? tall, handmade & signed? >> Finest art glass in the world!? >> Signed and in perfect condition!!? >>> From a very generous Lincoln donor >> Our Price: $65 >> >> Please see the link below for more photos: >> Correia Art Glass Perfume bottle with top - arts & crafts - by owner - sale >> - craigslist? >> >> | >> | >> | >> | | | >> >> | >> >> | >> | >> | | >> Correia Art Glass Perfume bottle with top - arts & crafts - by owner - >> sale - craigslist >> >> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, >> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups including >> Lincoln: Correia Art Glass perfume bottle... >> | | >> >> | >> >> | >> >> >> Please check out other artwork for sale on our?Facebook Marketplace page: >> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh >> >> Please call Joanna Schmergel to purchase?at?617-645-9059. Pickup at 18 >> Cerulean Way. ? >> >> *Giant dog is friendly? >> >> Serious inquiries only please.? >> >> ?All sales are final and all items are sold ?As Is?. >> >> These items are cross-posted for sale on other sites.? >> >> Payment in cash,?check or credit card on site >> >> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)?Boston Bridges Initiative >> has netted $36,422?since?January 2023. >> >> BBI?s Mission: >> Facilitate cultural exchange and promote meaningful social interaction >> between city and suburban families >> >> Learn more about the Boston Business Initiative here: >> >> https://bostonbridgesinitiative.org/ >> ?Warmly, >> Joanna Owen Schmergel? >> 617-645-9059 >> [email protected] >> pronouns: she/her/hers >> The Boston Bridges Initiative, a 501(c)(3) >> >> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) >> >> Boston Bridges Initiative? >> >> >> | >> | >> | >> | | | >> >> | >> >> | >> | >> | | >> Boston Bridges Initiative >> >> >> | | >> >> | >> >> | >> >> >> >> >> >> (The Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) program was >> originally started by the 501(c)(3) organization, Friends of Lincoln METCO, >> Lincoln METCO Coordinating Committee, in Lincoln, MA, and raised $170,000 >> from 2017 to 2022). >> >> As seen on?WBZ CBS News Boston: >> >> https://www.cbsnews.com/boston... >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/c1fac885/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_4126.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 2739725 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/c1fac885/attachment-0001.jpeg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 13 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:00:00 -0500 >> From: Ran Cronin <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] December Happenings at the Lincoln Public >> Library >> Message-ID: >> <cah+owxgikrtponkwqcjio3avfzvukwlkkfr+s_b4wfm00vx...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Here are just a few of the many events happening at LPL in December: >> >> The Nutcracker: A Preview >> >> Friday, December 1, 4-5 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-nutcracker-a-preview-3/>Join >> us for a reading of The Nutcracker geared to young children accompanied by >> dancers from the Commonwealth Ballet Company acting out some of the parts. >> Children get to meet the dancers after the reading. >> >> The Boston Tea Party: A ?What Was? Book Discussion! >> >> Wednesday, December 6, 3-4 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-boston-tea-party-a-what-was-book-discussion/> >> >> Celebrate "America's 250!" Join us for a discussion of the book What Was >> the Boston Tea Party? to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the notorious >> Dec 16, 1773 event. Books will be available at the Children's Desk to be >> read in advance. This event is perfect for families interested in history. >> Best for ages 6+ but anyone is welcome. Discussion, craft, and light >> refreshments served. Registration is limited to 30 for this >> discussion. Register >> here >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-boston-tea-party-a-what-was-book-discussion/> >> ! >> >> VIRTUAl Boston Tea Party at the 250th Anniversary >> >> Thursday, December 7, 7-8 PM, Register for Zoom Link >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/virtual-boston-tea-party-at-the-250th-anniversary/>This >> year marks the 250th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, a political >> protest that occurred on December 16, 1773 in Boston. Bringing vividly to >> life the diverse array of people and places that the Tea Party brought >> together ? from Chinese tea-pickers to English businessmen, Native American >> tribes, sugar plantation slaves, and Boston?s ladies of leisure ? >> Professor Benjamin >> L. Carp will share with us how a determined group of New Englanders shook >> the foundations of the British Empire, and what this has meant for >> Americans since. >> >> Benjamin L. Carp is the Daniel M. Lyons Professor of American History at >> Brooklyn College and teaches at the Graduate Center of the City University >> of New York. His latest book is The Great New York Fire of 1776: A Lost >> Story of the American Revolution. He also wrote Defiance of the Patriots: >> The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America (Yale, 2010), which won the >> Cox Book Prize from the Society of the Cincinnati in 2013, and Rebels >> Rising: Cities and the American Revolution (Oxford, 2007). Register here! >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/virtual-boston-tea-party-at-the-250th-anniversary/> >> >> LOMA Open Mike featuring Geoff Goodhue & Friends >> >> Tuesday, December 12, 7-10 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/loma-open-mike-featuring-geoff-goodhue-friends/>Raised >> in Boxford, Massachusetts, Geoff graduated from Ohio University in 2004 >> with a B.F.A. in Percussion Performance and currently lives in Jackson, New >> Hampshire. His family outfit, The Goodhues Band, was featured at the 2016 >> Mountain Laurel Autoharp Gathering. Come listen to Geoff and his friends! >> LOMA is a monthly open mike night event. For a slot, performers should >> email Rich Eilbert at [email protected] (before noon of the open-mike day) >> or sign up at the event. >> >> Gingerbread Fun! >> >> Wednesday, December 12, 4-5:30 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/gingerbread-fun-2/>Get >> into the holiday spirit with gingerbread stories and cookie decorating! All >> materials will be provided. Intended for children aged 5+. Register is >> required. Register by emailing [email protected]. >> >> VIRTUAL Brain Health with Dr. Jonathan Rosand >> >> Thursday, December 14, 7-8 PM, Register for Zoom Link >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/brain-health-with-dr-jonathan-rosand/>Join >> us for a talk about brain health with Critical Care Neurologist Jonathan >> Rosand, MD. Dr. Rosand?s talk will focus on brain care and brain health >> prevention, with a specific focus on lifestyle behaviors and modifications >> that can help one delay or prevent the incidence of dementia and late in >> life depression. He?s spoken about this topic many times over the years, >> and will have a series of slides to share and time for questions at the >> end. Register here! >> >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/brain-health-with-dr-jonathan-rosand/> >> >> A Gathering of Celtic and Christmas with Jeff Snow >> >> Friday, December 15, 12:30-1:30 PM at Bemis Hall, Council on Aging & Health >> Services >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/a-gathering-of-celtic-and-christmas-with-jeff-snow/>Join >> us for a celebration of Celtic and Christmas music at Bemis Hall, Council >> on Aging & Health Services! Jeff Snow is a talented multi-instrumentalist >> who plays the music and tells the stories behind the songs. He plays six >> and twelve string guitar, autoharp, Celtic Bouzouki & Bodhran. Learn more >> about Jeff?s music at his website, jeffsnow.net, and come hear him play! >> >> Lincoln Film Society Presents The Icestorm (1997, R) >> >> Thursday, December 21, 6-8 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/lincoln-library-film-society-64/> >> >> ?In the 1970s, an outwardly wholesome family begins cracking at the seams >> over the course of a tumultuous Thanksgiving break. Frustrated with his >> job, the father, Ben (Kevin Kline), seeks fulfillment by cheating on his >> wife, Elena (Joan Allen), with neighborhood seductress Janey (Sigourney >> Weaver). The family's strained relations continue to tighten until an ice >> storm strikes.? Some films may not be suitable for patrons under the age of >> 16. Sign up for the mailing list here >> <https://c45b8245.sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAGC-bWE9p6L6ouTPFdRYv4UT7Ul5jXigcFFTvq1jtppHhQdYAdo2C40AdxHsVn993vxhMwlRKfkOVFQumgxrJbYLbDjxuo1eUT_des9jgZPq0VWsY118_x16XBUmUEZ5upGYah59OdZkI6eYm5Hg0YH9_ZtkCKx_tsrnrnLx_kNHwDQIMyex37rE4q4hWApA-_hCsiEeC5x4> >> . >> >> Winter Musics and Muffins >> >> Friday, December 29, 10:30-11 AM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library >> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/winter-movies-and-muffins-3/> >> >> Come watch winter themed film versions of classic picture books and enjoy >> muffins and juice. Intended for children ages 2+. No registration required. >> >> Looking for more events at the Library? >> >> Library Linc <https://loom.ly/MSCnfGE> is our new weekly e-newsletter. >> Subscribe to keep up to date on our latest events, services, and news every >> Friday! >> >> >> -- >> Ran Cronin >> Assistant Director >> Lincoln Public Library <https://www.lincolnpl.org/> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/bb84d581/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 14 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:59:53 -0500 >> From: Stephen Dirrane <[email protected]> >> To: Edwina Lincoln <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Free stone dust >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> Hello LincolnTalk, >> >> It?s been an age old tradition in our family to give out stone dust on >> Thanksgiving. We have 2-3 yards or prime Cavechios stone dust, buttery >> smooth, which we?d love to share, just as the Wampanoag shared with the >> Pilgrims. >> >> Either email or text me at (978) 369-0024 if interested. And have a lovely >> Thanksgiving. >> >> Kind regards >> Stephen Dirrane >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 15 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:38:20 -0500 >> From: Edward Young <[email protected]> >> To: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >> project? >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Andy Wang wrote of my post about the Select Board?s November 16 mailing: >> ?Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing >> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent. " >> >> But the PROMINENCE with which the various numbers are presented to the >> voters is the ENTIRE point of my post. Why are the most important numbers >> buried, or not included at all, and an extraneous number highlighted? >> >> In fuller detail: >> >> 1. The information most critical to town citizens about the tax effects of >> each of the three proposals they are being asked to vote upon, which have >> proposed costs of $12.5M, $18.75M and $25M respectively, is presumably what >> percentage increases in their taxes are estimated for each price point. That >> is certainly the first thing I would want to know. These percentages are >> nowhere disclosed in the mailing. Why were these numbers not the numbers >> most prominently set forth? Why were they not included at all? >> >> 2. Yes, a useful way of illustrating these percentage increases would be to >> translate them into dollar amounts for a Lincoln home of median value. But >> the fourth page merely says ?TAX IMPACT: Up to $773 increase,? ?TAX IMPACT: >> Up to $541 increase,? and ?TAX IMPACT: Up to $387 increase? without saying >> that these numbers are for a median home and that for half the town >> residents the dollar amount would necessarily be larger than the ?Up to? >> amount. Also it is not disclosed there that the increase would be in effect >> for decades, not for a single year. Why was not clearer language such as >> ?ANNUAL TAX IMPACT FOR MEDIAN HOME? used instead of ?TAX IMPACT: Up to $773 >> increase?? Doesn?t that wording imply that nobody would have an increase >> greater than $773? >> >> 3. Later on, you can find a reference that the tax impact number is per >> median home if you read the tiny type on the fifth page. This illustrates my >> point about prominence of disclosure. >> >> 4. Later on, the sixth page sets forth tables of numbers for hypothetical >> amounts of borrowings at price points that bear no relation to the proposed >> costs for the project, so that voters must calculate the necessary >> adjustments to the real numbers for themselves, assuming that the entire >> cost of the project is to be bonded and the debt service paid entirely by >> future taxes. How does using hypothetical amounts rather than the actual >> proposed amounts aid the readers? understanding? And why is the hypothetical >> dollar amount, which is far less than any of the proposed project costs, the >> one that gets highlighted by itself in the left hand column? Voters don?t >> need to know the dollar amount for a hypothetical $10M, they need to know >> the actual dollar amounts for the actual price points they are voting on. >> >> 5. There is a reference to a "Stabilization balance" of $5.5M but no >> explanation is provided as to what this term means or how it relates to the >> cost of the project. If it is meant to imply that some portion of the >> project cost may be paid out of existing town funds, it should also be >> pointed out that those funds came from past taxes and that any other uses to >> which they would otherwise have been put would need to be funded from future >> taxes. >> >> 6. One would expect that the most important information for voters would be >> highlighted by presenting it (for example) in the largest type size, in >> boldface, on the stand-alone page with lots of white space that is captioned >> ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT.? Instead, the ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT? page does not >> mention either the estimated percentage increases in everybody?s tax bill or >> the estimated dollar amounts for a median home; instead, the dollar amount >> most prominently displayed on the ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT? page is a number >> for the tax impact of servicing a hypothetical amount of debt ($10M) that is >> lower than any of the costs proposed for the project ($12.5M. $18.75M and >> $25M). Please explain why that number is highlighted while some (but not >> all) of the numbers corresponding to the actual proposed costs are set forth >> elsewhere in smaller non-bold type on densely packed pages and without any >> of the necessary explanation provided on the later pages. >> >> Those are the kinds of questions that I know the Securities and Exchange >> Commission staff would raise if a company presented numbers in a draft of a >> document in the manner presented in the November 16 mailing. The SEC folks >> definitely recognize that the prominence with which data catches the >> reader?s eye, and the orderliness with which the information is presented, >> is every bit as important as whether everything gets printed in small print >> somewhere in the document. (And of course the estimated percentage increases >> in everybody?s tax bill are not presented at all). >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/7fb55c7b/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 16 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:04:16 -0500 >> From: Karla Gravis <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >> project? >> Message-ID: >> <CAPP=LegkTOeO-4TuUyZ2V4_0u4jZSb-D1WRR-A1m=vojkzq...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> ?(?) just pointing out that the values seem to be properly labeled and >> consistent.? is quoted in the email below. >> >> Unfortunately, this is *not* correct. The first page that the tax impact is >> mentioned (attached below) very clearly says that the tax impact will be >> ?up to $773/$541$/$387 increase? with no footnote nor comment on that page >> that indicates this is for the median home value. The font is much bigger >> than anywhere else. >> >> Anyone reading this page would expect their tax impact to not be more than >> those numbers. It is not enough to have it elsewhere in the document, there >> should be a footnote any time a tax impact is mentioned. >> >> A retraction or clarification from the CCBC is overdue. >> >> >> >> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:17 >>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >>> project? >>> To: Edward Young <[email protected]> >>> CC: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as >>> 'Estimated tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also >>> for the FY23 Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of >>> $17,488), so it will vary based on individual home prices. There is also >>> the chart on the right of that same slide that provides details on the >>> impact based on how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M, >>> $20M, $25M) of a CC. I believe this chart was provided by FinCom. >>> >>> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are >>> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the >>> three designs. It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the >>> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center. >>> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your >>> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g. >>> >>> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing >>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent. >>> >>> - Andy (not the FinCom one...) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected tax >>>> impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently >>>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s >>>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact? is far LOWER >>>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the proposals, >>>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board >>>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to $773 >>>> increase,? depending on the size of the project. >>>> >>>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading >>>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, on >>>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of ?up >>>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are >>>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed >>>> information. >>>> >>>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission >>>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with >>>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in >>>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing. >>>> >>>> Edward Young >>>> Bedford Road >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>> Browse the archives at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>> >>>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ >>> . >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/5d6f8f04/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_5450.jpg >> Type: image/jpg >> Size: 985832 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/5d6f8f04/attachment-0001.jpg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 17 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:23:13 -0500 >> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]> >> To: Karla Gravis <[email protected]> >> Cc: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >> project? >> Message-ID: >> <caefvrnfeohxjcvlb8+nvtzhlassxlogesetzc06yswnt7lu...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Nope, you're correct. The values reported on that page are insufficiently >> labeled. I missed that page and stand corrected. >> >> - Andy >> >> >>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 3:04?PM Karla Gravis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ?(?) just pointing out that the values seem to be properly labeled and >>> consistent.? is quoted in the email below. >>> >>> Unfortunately, this is *not* correct. The first page that the tax impact >>> is mentioned (attached below) very clearly says that the tax impact will be >>> ?up to $773/$541$/$387 increase? with no footnote nor comment on that page >>> that indicates this is for the median home value. The font is much bigger >>> than anywhere else. >>> >>> Anyone reading this page would expect their tax impact to not be more than >>> those numbers. It is not enough to have it elsewhere in the document, there >>> should be a footnote any time a tax impact is mentioned. >>> >>> A retraction or clarification from the CCBC is overdue. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:17 >>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC >>>> project? >>>> To: Edward Young <[email protected]> >>>> CC: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as >>>> 'Estimated tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also >>>> for the FY23 Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of >>>> $17,488), so it will vary based on individual home prices. There is also >>>> the chart on the right of that same slide that provides details on the >>>> impact based on how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M, >>>> $20M, $25M) of a CC. I believe this chart was provided by FinCom. >>>> >>>> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are >>>> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the >>>> three designs. It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the >>>> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center. >>>> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your >>>> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g. >>>> >>>> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing >>>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent. >>>> >>>> - Andy (not the FinCom one...) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected >>>>> tax impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently >>>>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s >>>>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact? is far LOWER >>>>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the proposals, >>>>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board >>>>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to >>>>> $773 >>>>> increase,? depending on the size of the project. >>>>> >>>>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading >>>>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, >>>>> on >>>>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of >>>>> ?up >>>>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are >>>>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed >>>>> information. >>>>> >>>>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission >>>>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with >>>>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in >>>>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing. >>>>> >>>>> Edward Young >>>>> Bedford Road >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>> Browse the archives at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>> >>>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/3bf5e955/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_5450.jpg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 985832 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/3bf5e955/attachment-0001.jpg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 18 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:13:35 -0500 >> From: Cris Ratiner <[email protected]> >> To: LincolnTalk Listserve <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Posting for teenager: kids books for sale >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hi Lincoln, >> >> My son, now a sophisticated high schooler, has pared through his voluminous >> bookshelves. He would like to make a few dollars toward his school band >> trip and offers the following collections for a small amount. I can vouch >> for the fact that these are all in good condition, having been read once at >> most. (Full disclosure: we have a dog, but no cats or mold in the house). >> >> Happy Thanksgiving! >> >> Cris Ratiner >> >> >> >> GERONIMO STILTON COLLECTION: $35 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1573.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 207270 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0008.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> >> MO WILLEMS trilogy: $5 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1572.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 180528 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0009.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> >> COLLECTION OF NEWBURY AWARD WINNERS and/or. NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLERS: $45 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1571.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 228211 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0010.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> >> >> ARTEMIS FOWL SET. $5 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1570.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 194609 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0011.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> DRAGON MASTERS COLLECTION: $5 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1569.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 219283 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0012.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> LLOYD ALEXANDER SET: $8 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1568.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 122349 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0013.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> WINGS OF FIRE SERIES: $8 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1567.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 145203 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0014.jpeg> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> >> >> >> MARCH TRILOGY: $8 >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_1566.jpeg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 173440 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0015.jpeg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 19 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:22:23 -0500 >> From: Anne Warner <[email protected]> >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Cc: Scott Clary <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/b0037711/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 20 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:59:51 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Terri <[email protected]> >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>, Sara Mattes >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln!? >> I'd like to sprinkle alittle humor into this conversation..... so I'll tag >> onto Sara's "One Fell Swoop" comment with a hilarious skit from my favorite >> comedian.. Nate Borgatze.? Enjoy... don't worry no profanities! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldwfL1gJ4jw >> >> >> Terri Kafina. :) >> On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:48:19 AM EST, Sara Mattes >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I suggest you put LincolnTalk in the search function, scan and delete in one >> fell swoop.In the alternative, subscribe for the digest format and it will >> arrive as a package- easy to digest?as I pray the meal we will probably >> stuff ourselves with is too.? >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Nov 23, 2023, at 11:08 AM, Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> ? >> You might be happily retired. Speak for yourself. 200 plus emails a week >> packed in with desirable emails becomes a full-time job. One suitable for a >> retired person sipping a cup of Joe in the morning.? >> It always amuses me when people cannot see beyond themselves. On this >> Thanksgiving Day, not because you don?t have a problem, that does not mean >> that someone else does not.? >> Get Outlook for iOSFrom: Scott Clary <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 10:48:24 AM >> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>; LincolnTalk >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln?Happy Thanksgiving >> Lincoln! >> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button.? >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Scott Clary >> 617-968-5769 >> >> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors??? >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am overwhelmed. >> This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they should send >> multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis.? >> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they >> keep coming. Help admin! >> Donald >> Get Outlook for iOSFrom: Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf >> of John Mendelson <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM >> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln?We are all lucky to live >> here.? Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA chatter on Lincoln Talk? >> My in-box and peace of mind could use it. >> John-- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> >> -- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> -- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/e1b16c97/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 21 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:40:02 -0600 >> From: Richard Theriault <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] For Sale: Men?s MOTO snowboard boots size 11.5. >> Very good condition. $40 >> Message-ID: >> <CAGhv85Cg3FY8PGAOsTPo7eVE5h-W490AWY=wwgvynimzaor...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hi LT, >> >> If interested you can send me a text at 617 438 4315 or email me at >> [email protected]. >> >> Thnx >> >> Rich >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/1abedd58/attachment-0001.htm> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: IMG_3787.jpg >> Type: image/jpeg >> Size: 633892 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/1abedd58/attachment-0001.jpg> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 22 >> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 09:22:00 -0500 >> From: Bijoy Misra <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] non-turkey Thanksgiving >> Message-ID: >> <calw-kjustn-rkpsevibn7gzgqfon4uq4095sz+ogrutfhyc...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Dear friends,, >> In this town of Lincoln, I am a minority Hindu of Indian descent. >> Hindu is not a prescriptive religion, it is an empirical belief system >> of acknowledgement. That our existence is a blessing of myriads >> of other objects and cosmos is the acknowledgement. I will >> complete twenty years of my residence in Lincoln next April. >> I thank you all for being good friends, wise neighbors, loving >> elders and analytic young professionals. Above all, I thank you >> all for the deep respect to the ground, to the earth. The ground >> is the core teacher of Hinduism. We dig it, we tear it and it still >> blesses us with food and shelter. It's the Mother. Let us continue >> to respect the ground in our own way. Let the ground continue to >> bless us with her trees, herbs, flowers, animals, birds and insects. . >> Happy Thanksgiving. >> Best regards, >> Bijoy Misra >> Bedford Road >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/f46b0cc8/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 23 >> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:42:51 -0500 >> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]> >> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> >> Subject: [LincolnTalk] For Decades, Southern States Considered >> Thanksgiving an Act of Northern Aggression >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> And we thought our debates over the Community Center and HCA zoning were >> heated, pumpkin pie seems to have out done us. >> >> >> For Decades, Southern States Considered Thanksgiving an Act of Northern >> Aggression >> In the 19th century, pumpkin pie ignited a culture war. >> >> https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/thanksgiving-pumpkin-pie-culture-war?utm_source=share_by_email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mailto_share >> >> ------ >> Sara Mattes >> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231124/7d59be9f/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> -- >> This is the DIGEST of the LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of Lincoln Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33 >> **************************************** > > -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to [email protected]. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. > -- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
