If it is true: I doubt it is legal?
Can someone with Town Elections knowledge confirm or deny the veracity?


> On Nov 24, 2023, at 8:56 AM, Paula Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Wait, is this true?  In order to vote on Dec 2nd we need to be registered to 
> vote on ZONING or just need to be a registered voter in Lincoln?
> 
> Please clarify?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Paula Robinson
> 617.981.1945
> 
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2023, at 8:51 AM, Christi Damico <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Is it true that to vote on December 2, a resident must be registered for 
>> this specific vote only?
>> 
>> That seems shady.  I can understand the need to register to vote in the Town 
>> but why register AGAIN for this specific voting opportunity?  I’ve never 
>> heard of such a thing.
>> 
>> My mom would like to vote.  She has been very occupied with other big 
>> issues.  I don’t think she should be disenfranchised from voting because of 
>> this?  She has been registered to vote in this Town and is a Lincoln 
>> resident since 1975.
>> 
>> Christi Damico
>> Lincoln/WA
>> 
>>>> On Nov 24, 2023, at 1:29 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>> Send Lincoln mailing list submissions to
>>>  [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>  https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>  [email protected]
>>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>  [email protected]
>>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Lincoln digest..."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>>> 
>>> 1. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Danielle Pierce)
>>> 2. deCordova I Store Thanksgiving Weekend Shopping Hours
>>>    (Mary Balogh)
>>> 3. Re: How many housing units at Lincoln Station? (Margaret Olson)
>>> 4. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Andy Wang)
>>> 5. Re: How many housing units at Lincoln Station?
>>>    (?Sarah Postlethwait)
>>> 6. Re: Radical change in Lincoln (Sara Mattes)
>>> 7. FS: For Sale for BBI: $950 Correia Art Glass "Lilac and Black
>>>    Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? diameter, handmade, signed, $295!!
>>>    (Joanna Owen Schmergel)
>>> 8. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Scott Clary)
>>> 9. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (V Saleme)
>>> 10. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Donald Fonseca)
>>> 11. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Sara Mattes)
>>> 12. FS: For Sale for BBI: Correia Art Glass perfume bottle with
>>>    top, 6? tall, handmade & signed $65 (Joanna Owen Schmergel)
>>> 13. December Happenings at the Lincoln Public Library (Ran Cronin)
>>> 14. Free stone dust (Stephen Dirrane)
>>> 15. What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Edward Young)
>>> 16. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project?
>>>    (Karla Gravis)
>>> 17. Re: What is the REAL tax increase for the CC project? (Andy Wang)
>>> 18. Posting for teenager:  kids books for sale (Cris Ratiner)
>>> 19. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Anne Warner)
>>> 20. Re: Thankful to live in Lincoln (Terri)
>>> 21. For Sale: Men?s MOTO snowboard boots size 11.5. Very good
>>>    condition. $40 (Richard Theriault)
>>> 22. non-turkey Thanksgiving (Bijoy Misra)
>>> 23. For Decades, Southern States Considered Thanksgiving an Act
>>>    of Northern Aggression (Sara Mattes)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:21:03 -0400
>>> From: Danielle Pierce <[email protected]>
>>> To: John Mendelson <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CAFdo4aCtSojX=voqukmm+a2k-fgjzxj-h8yeyaa+8rbgdns...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> With all due respect, this is a huge issue that is being voted on very
>>> soon.  Moreover, there seem to be a lot of things that are only now being
>>> discovered.  If people want to talk, they should.   If people don?t want to
>>> talk or listen, they shouldn?t.  But trying to silence people at this point
>>> in the process sounds huge alarm bells.
>>> 
>>> Danielle Pierce
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (Sent from my phone; apologies for formatting issues)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 9:49 PM John Mendelson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> We are all lucky to live here.  Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA
>>>> chatter on Lincoln Talk?
>>>> 
>>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it.
>>>> 
>>>> John
>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
>>>> .
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231122/b8b9d054/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:30:00 -0500
>>> From: Mary Balogh <[email protected]>
>>> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] deCordova I Store Thanksgiving Weekend Shopping
>>>  Hours
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <cajmpjvnwq3oc9uusa-os-ymjgmfzmdckwzkuatph9mfywjh...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> HAPPY THANKSGIVING to you from the deCordova Store!
>>> Our Thanksgiving weekend hours are:
>>> 
>>> *FRIDAY:  10am - 4pm*  *GREEN FRIDAY:* *Take the **Gratitude and Awe Family
>>> Hike *https://thetrustees.org/event/85855/*, and then stop by the store to
>>> see what's new for the holidays!*
>>> *SATURDAY: 10am - 5pm*  *SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY - Shop small, shop local,
>>> shop at a not-for-profit!*
>>> *SUNDAY:  10am - 5pm*. *MUSEUM STORE SUNDAY** - Members double their store
>>> discount to 20%!*
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [image: image.png]
>>> 
>>> The Trustees | *deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum*
>>> 51 Sandy Pond Road? |? Lincoln, MA 01773
>>> 781.259.8692 Store
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/58c37b6a/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: image.png
>>> Type: image/png
>>> Size: 4471 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/58c37b6a/attachment-0001.png>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:48:07 -0500
>>> From: Margaret Olson <[email protected]>
>>> To: ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Laurie Gray <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] How many housing units at Lincoln Station?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <cahqz9n3vl003b9-o74heyaz90voexydelcz+vw-91ekv6rt...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Yes, the current draft permits additional height by special permit. All I
>>> was trying to say is that if it?s not in the zoning we can?t do it.
>>> 
>>> Please note that this is an early incomplete draft. Once it is a complete
>>> draft there will be public hearings at which citizens can give feedback
>>> before it is up for the vote at town meeting.
>>> 
>>> Generally there is a trade off between wiggle room in the form of special
>>> permits and specificity. If the zoning is more specific both the town and
>>> the applicant know exactly what will and will not be permitted. If there is
>>> a special permit the town (and neighbors) have negotiating power.
>>> 
>>> Since we currently have a working document you will see places where both
>>> the specific and the special permit are written in. This is an artifact of
>>> the drafting process. There is reason we haven?t published the working
>>> draft: it?s hard to follow in it?s current state.
>>> 
>>> Margaret
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:52 PM ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The current bylaw draft states ?additional Height, Stories, and Density
>>>> may be allowed by a Special Permit granted by the Planning board.?
>>>> 
>>>> This seems to directly contradict what you are saying.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If the planning board is unable to allow by special permit more than 3
>>>> stories, more than 42? or more than 25 UPA?. why is this included in the
>>>> current draft of the village center bylaws?
>>>> 
>>>> Sarah Postlethwait
>>>> 
>>>> Lewis Street
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:46?PM Margaret Olson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Note: neither the RLF nor Civico can "ask the planning board" to approve
>>>>> anything that is not permitted in the zoning. It is the zoning you will be
>>>>> voting on in March. As Sarah notes, the HCA zoning by-law is currently an
>>>>> incomplete working draft. There will be multiple public hearings before 
>>>>> the
>>>>> March town meeting on the zoning, and once the draft is somewhat coherent
>>>>> it will be published on the town website.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ?On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29?PM ??Sarah Postlethwait?? <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a really great approach to the mall debate, and I think those of
>>>>>> us who are especially concerned about the mall development would embrace 
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> incremental rezoning to see what the town infrastructure is able to 
>>>>>> handle.
>>>>>> Unfortunately, it sounds like the developer who is in talks with the 
>>>>>> owner
>>>>>> of the mall, the RLF, does not want anything less than 25 UPA to be 
>>>>>> allowed
>>>>>> at this time.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some history:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ???
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Option C, D1, D2 & D3 all include the RLF/mall, Dohertys garage and 3
>>>>>> town owned parcels/commuter lots, a total of 7.1 acres are being 
>>>>>> proposed in
>>>>>> the village center to be rezoned at 25 units per acre.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 125 units would be allowed to be developed on the non town owned
>>>>>> parcels.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 53 additional units could be built on the town owned parcels.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oriole landing has 60 units for reference
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And there are 2078 units in Lincoln currently without counting Hanscom.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Option E asks the town to bring the mall development as a separate
>>>>>> matter to town meeting. It also allows 144 additional units in south
>>>>>> Lincoln to be built on top of what is already built in this area.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ???
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> At the 11/8 HCAWG morning meeting, the RLF representative of the HCAWG
>>>>>> seemed to state that it?s difficult to fit even 85 units on their 4 acres
>>>>>> while keeping Donelans and the Post office, as they have promised to do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I asked the HCAWG and the RLF rep at this meeting why they would not
>>>>>> consider reducing the UPA (units per acre) to 15 at the mall instead of 
>>>>>> 25
>>>>>> UPA. That would allow for 60 units on the RLF portion alone, and 107
>>>>>> units in the entire Village district- plus all of what was being proposed
>>>>>> in the rest of Options C-D3. If they wanted more in the future it could 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> taken to town meeting (this seems to be what you are proposing now?)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The RLF rep stated that ?it would be the difference between a
>>>>>> development happening and no development happening?. Implying that the
>>>>>> developer they are working with would not accept less than 25 UPA, even 
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> they can?t build that many units now, and they would walk away and 
>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>> would get built.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Civico has expressed its need for 25 UPA to redevelop the RLF portion of
>>>>>> the mall (100 units). From the HCAWG SOTT slide deck: ?RLF is working
>>>>>> with a developer known to and trusted by the Town: CIVICO? and ?Based on
>>>>>> current analysis, a minimum of 25 units/acre is needed for a financially
>>>>>> viable project?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In addition to the 100 units being proposed at the mall, TCB (owners of
>>>>>> Lincoln Woods) is in negotiations with the town for development on the
>>>>>> large commuter lot (discussed during the 11/20 Planning board meeting).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All HCAWG presentations to date have stated that the tallest building
>>>>>> allowed would be 42? and 3 stories at the mall. However, the zoning bylaw
>>>>>> draft discussed 11/20 actually allowed 48? and 4 stories by right for any
>>>>>> buildings 100? away from the Lincoln road. After some push back, this was
>>>>>> adjusted to 42? and 3 stories by right and anything higher than 42? or
>>>>>> denser than 25UPA could be permitted by Planning Board Approval. (See 
>>>>>> photo
>>>>>> below)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And the bylaw draft also stated ?More requirements may be inserted here
>>>>>> once a discussion with Andrew Consigli takes place?. Andrew Consigli is
>>>>>> the owner of Civico development.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Obviously this is just a draft of the proposed bylaws and can be
>>>>>> adjusted even further in the future- but it?s a perfect example of
>>>>>> discussions that are happening out of public eye with the developers and
>>>>>> what they intend to ask the planning board to build once one of the
>>>>>> proposed options are passed at town meeting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Many people who are in support of Option E are also fully in support of
>>>>>> development at the mall. We just want thoughtful, controlled development
>>>>>> that isn?t too much for our town infrastructure to handle.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sarah Postlethwait
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:19?AM Laurie Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I still feel relatively new to this HCA debate, but in the past few
>>>>>>> weeks I have been following the debate closely as I am realizing how
>>>>>>> important it is for the future of our town.  I have wondered if people
>>>>>>> appearing to be on opposite sides of the debate are actually closer
>>>>>>> together than it seems.  A question I have for Lincoln talk and the 
>>>>>>> greater
>>>>>>> community is: how many additional housing units do we want in Lincoln
>>>>>>> station?  I think many agree we need additional housing in the Lincoln
>>>>>>> Station area but it is unclear to me if people have widely different 
>>>>>>> views
>>>>>>> on how much housing.
>>>>>>> To me, it is hard to know what life would be like in Lincoln with more
>>>>>>> housing units at the station, so I am in favor of an incremental 
>>>>>>> approach,
>>>>>>> where we can try out some number of units first and then make further
>>>>>>> decisions at a later point.  But what is this number and how do we 
>>>>>>> arrive
>>>>>>> at this number?  What number is high enough to feel "substantial" but 
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> so high that we destroy quality of life?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: image_123650291.JPG
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 261039 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.jpe>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: 1FB3E4C7-58AC-4104-809C-1030CA33F30F.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 422928 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/0ea256ce/attachment-0001.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:16:21 -0500
>>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]>
>>> To: Edward Young <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>  project?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <caefvrnh0-xvnwxyrdgykj2-hzbf-bjpcwasjdqqjm4zthwr...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as 'Estimated
>>> tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also for the FY23
>>> Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of $17,488), so
>>> it will vary based on individual home prices.   There is also the chart on
>>> the right of that same slide that provides details on the impact based on
>>> how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M, $20M, $25M) of a
>>> CC.  I believe this chart was provided by FinCom.
>>> 
>>> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are
>>> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the
>>> three designs.  It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the
>>> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center.
>>> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your
>>> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g.
>>> 
>>> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing
>>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent.
>>> 
>>> - Andy (not the FinCom one...)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected tax
>>>> impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently
>>>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s
>>>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact?  is far LOWER
>>>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the proposals,
>>>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board
>>>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to $773
>>>> increase,? depending on the size of the project.
>>>> 
>>>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading
>>>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, on
>>>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of ?up
>>>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are
>>>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed
>>>> information.
>>>> 
>>>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission
>>>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with
>>>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in
>>>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing.
>>>> 
>>>> Edward Young
>>>> Bedford Road
>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
>>>> .
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/44e4e16c/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 5
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:30:58 -0500
>>> From: ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]>
>>> To: Margaret Olson <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Laurie Gray <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] How many housing units at Lincoln Station?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CAH9ufVu-nio+sUdtmxMBNzfQ9GC=ak_hiqeridbtea7bxu7...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> With all due respect,
>>> 
>>> If the town is voting on an option that is being advertised as 3 stories,
>>> 42? maximum, and 25 units an acre maximum- it should be impossible for
>>> anything higher or denser to be permitted unless by town meeting vote. This
>>> is what the town is expecting the bylaws to reflect, and what they are
>>> assuming when voting in a week on the proposed options.
>>> 
>>> Furthermore, This ?wiggle room? clause was not included in every
>>> Subdistrict of the draft bylaws. It was only included in the village center
>>> portion.
>>> 
>>> And if you look directly above it, a note about adjusting the draft bylaws
>>> based on the wishes of a developer, Andrew Consigli, is written in.
>>> 
>>> It?s very clear that the developers want 4 story/48? buildings, and no lot
>>> coverage restrictions, and limited commercial and parking requirements. It
>>> is astonishing to me that we are handing it to them on a silver platter
>>> while telling the town a completely different story. Draft or not, these
>>> are very concerning points that the public should be aware of when being
>>> asked to unnecessarily include the Village Center into the HCA rezoning in
>>> a week at town meeting.
>>> 
>>> Sarah Postlethwait
>>> 
>>> Lewis St
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 7:48?AM Margaret Olson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, the current draft permits additional height by special permit. All I
>>>> was trying to say is that if it?s not in the zoning we can?t do it.
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that this is an early incomplete draft. Once it is a complete
>>>> draft there will be public hearings at which citizens can give feedback
>>>> before it is up for the vote at town meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> Generally there is a trade off between wiggle room in the form of special
>>>> permits and specificity. If the zoning is more specific both the town and
>>>> the applicant know exactly what will and will not be permitted. If there is
>>>> a special permit the town (and neighbors) have negotiating power.
>>>> 
>>>> Since we currently have a working document you will see places where both
>>>> the specific and the special permit are written in. This is an artifact of
>>>> the drafting process. There is reason we haven?t published the working
>>>> draft: it?s hard to follow in it?s current state.
>>>> 
>>>> Margaret
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:52 PM ?Sarah Postlethwait <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The current bylaw draft states ?additional Height, Stories, and Density
>>>>> may be allowed by a Special Permit granted by the Planning board.?
>>>>> 
>>>>> This seems to directly contradict what you are saying.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the planning board is unable to allow by special permit more than 3
>>>>> stories, more than 42? or more than 25 UPA?. why is this included in the
>>>>> current draft of the village center bylaws?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sarah Postlethwait
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lewis Street
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:46?PM Margaret Olson <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note: neither the RLF nor Civico can "ask the planning board" to approve
>>>>>> anything that is not permitted in the zoning. It is the zoning you will 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> voting on in March. As Sarah notes, the HCA zoning by-law is currently an
>>>>>> incomplete working draft. There will be multiple public hearings before 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> March town meeting on the zoning, and once the draft is somewhat coherent
>>>>>> it will be published on the town website.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ?On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29?PM ??Sarah Postlethwait?? <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a really great approach to the mall debate, and I think those
>>>>>>> of us who are especially concerned about the mall development would 
>>>>>>> embrace
>>>>>>> an incremental rezoning to see what the town infrastructure is able to
>>>>>>> handle. Unfortunately, it sounds like the developer who is in talks with
>>>>>>> the owner of the mall, the RLF, does not want anything less than 25 UPA 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be allowed at this time.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some history:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ???
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Option C, D1, D2 & D3 all include the RLF/mall, Dohertys garage and 3
>>>>>>> town owned parcels/commuter lots, a total of 7.1 acres are being 
>>>>>>> proposed in
>>>>>>> the village center to be rezoned at 25 units per acre.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 125 units would be allowed to be developed on the non town owned
>>>>>>> parcels.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 53 additional units could be built on the town owned parcels.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Oriole landing has 60 units for reference
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And there are 2078 units in Lincoln currently without counting Hanscom.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Option E asks the town to bring the mall development as a separate
>>>>>>> matter to town meeting. It also allows 144 additional units in south
>>>>>>> Lincoln to be built on top of what is already built in this area.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ???
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At the 11/8 HCAWG morning meeting, the RLF representative of the HCAWG
>>>>>>> seemed to state that it?s difficult to fit even 85 units on their 4 
>>>>>>> acres
>>>>>>> while keeping Donelans and the Post office, as they have promised to do.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I asked the HCAWG and the RLF rep at this meeting why they would not
>>>>>>> consider reducing the UPA (units per acre) to 15 at the mall instead of 
>>>>>>> 25
>>>>>>> UPA. That would allow for 60 units on the RLF portion alone, and 107
>>>>>>> units in the entire Village district- plus all of what was being 
>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>> in the rest of Options C-D3. If they wanted more in the future it could 
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> taken to town meeting (this seems to be what you are proposing now?)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The RLF rep stated that ?it would be the difference between a
>>>>>>> development happening and no development happening?. Implying that the
>>>>>>> developer they are working with would not accept less than 25 UPA, even 
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> they can?t build that many units now, and they would walk away and 
>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>> would get built.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Civico has expressed its need for 25 UPA to redevelop the RLF portion
>>>>>>> of the mall (100 units). From the HCAWG SOTT slide deck: ?RLF is
>>>>>>> working with a developer known to and trusted by the Town: CIVICO? and
>>>>>>> ?Based on current analysis, a minimum of 25 units/acre is needed for a
>>>>>>> financially viable project?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In addition to the 100 units being proposed at the mall, TCB (owners of
>>>>>>> Lincoln Woods) is in negotiations with the town for development on the
>>>>>>> large commuter lot (discussed during the 11/20 Planning board meeting).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All HCAWG presentations to date have stated that the tallest building
>>>>>>> allowed would be 42? and 3 stories at the mall. However, the zoning 
>>>>>>> bylaw
>>>>>>> draft discussed 11/20 actually allowed 48? and 4 stories by right for 
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> buildings 100? away from the Lincoln road. After some push back, this 
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> adjusted to 42? and 3 stories by right and anything higher than 42? or
>>>>>>> denser than 25UPA could be permitted by Planning Board Approval. (See 
>>>>>>> photo
>>>>>>> below)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And the bylaw draft also stated ?More requirements may be inserted
>>>>>>> here once a discussion with Andrew Consigli takes place?. Andrew
>>>>>>> Consigli is the owner of Civico development.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Obviously this is just a draft of the proposed bylaws and can be
>>>>>>> adjusted even further in the future- but it?s a perfect example of
>>>>>>> discussions that are happening out of public eye with the developers and
>>>>>>> what they intend to ask the planning board to build once one of the
>>>>>>> proposed options are passed at town meeting.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Many people who are in support of Option E are also fully in support of
>>>>>>> development at the mall. We just want thoughtful, controlled development
>>>>>>> that isn?t too much for our town infrastructure to handle.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sarah Postlethwait
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:19?AM Laurie Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I still feel relatively new to this HCA debate, but in the past few
>>>>>>>> weeks I have been following the debate closely as I am realizing how
>>>>>>>> important it is for the future of our town.  I have wondered if people
>>>>>>>> appearing to be on opposite sides of the debate are actually closer
>>>>>>>> together than it seems.  A question I have for Lincoln talk and the 
>>>>>>>> greater
>>>>>>>> community is: how many additional housing units do we want in Lincoln
>>>>>>>> station?  I think many agree we need additional housing in the Lincoln
>>>>>>>> Station area but it is unclear to me if people have widely different 
>>>>>>>> views
>>>>>>>> on how much housing.
>>>>>>>> To me, it is hard to know what life would be like in Lincoln with more
>>>>>>>> housing units at the station, so I am in favor of an incremental 
>>>>>>>> approach,
>>>>>>>> where we can try out some number of units first and then make further
>>>>>>>> decisions at a later point.  But what is this number and how do we 
>>>>>>>> arrive
>>>>>>>> at this number?  What number is high enough to feel "substantial" but 
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> so high that we destroy quality of life?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: image_123650291.JPG
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 261039 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.jpe>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: 1FB3E4C7-58AC-4104-809C-1030CA33F30F.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 422928 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/a3578e07/attachment-0001.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 6
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:53:18 -0500
>>> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]>
>>> To: Michael Dembowski <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected], "Listserv, Listserv"
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Radical change in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/6f5bc27b/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 7
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: Joanna Owen Schmergel <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] FS: For Sale for BBI: $950 Correia Art Glass
>>>  "Lilac and Black Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? diameter, handmade,
>>>  signed, $295!!
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Give the gift of?art this holiday season while supporting a worthy cause!?
>>> Easy, convenient?shopping right here in Lincoln!?
>>> Just 3?weeks left to shop before we shut down for the holidays!!?
>>> Now even MORE price?reductions!?
>>> We have a $40,000?goal by December 15th!!!
>>> We have $3,578?more to go!!?
>>> And we are STILL taking donations!!?
>>> See all of our available?listings here!?
>>> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh
>>> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, 
>>> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups 
>>> including Lincoln:?
>>> $950?Correia Art Glass "Lilac and Black Iris" VASE, 12? tall, 7.75? 
>>> diameter, handmade, signed, $295!!?
>>> Finest art glass in the world!?
>>> Signed and in perfect condition!!?
>>>> From a very generous Lincoln donor
>>> Current retail: $950
>>> Correia Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE 8620 - Priceless Galleries?
>>> 
>>> |  
>>> |   
>>> |   
>>> |   |    |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |  
>>> |   |  
>>> Correia Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE 8620 - Priceless Galleries
>>> 
>>> LILAC AND BLACK IRIS Limited Edition: VASE 8620 Hand Signed: Yes and Dated 
>>> Condition: Excellent Size 12 X 7 Provenance: New with COA. Certificate of 
>>> Authenticity: Yes
>>> |   |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Our Price: $295!!
>>> 
>>> Please see the link below for more photos:
>>> Correia Art Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE - arts & crafts - by owner - 
>>> sale - craigslist?
>>> 
>>> |  
>>> |   
>>> |   
>>> |   |    |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |  
>>> |   |  
>>> Correia Art Glass Lilac and Black Iris VASE - arts &#38; crafts - by owner 
>>> - sale - craigslist
>>> 
>>> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, 
>>> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups 
>>> including Lincoln: $950 Correia Art Glass Lilac and...
>>> |   |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please check out other artwork for sale on our?Facebook Marketplace page:
>>> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh
>>> 
>>> Please call Joanna Schmergel to purchase?at?617-645-9059. Pickup at 18 
>>> Cerulean Way. ?
>>> 
>>> *Giant dog is friendly?
>>> 
>>> Serious inquiries only please.?
>>> 
>>> ?All sales are final and all items are sold ?As Is?.
>>> 
>>> These items are cross-posted for sale on other sites.?
>>> 
>>> Payment in cash,?check or credit card on site
>>> 
>>> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)?Boston Bridges Initiative 
>>> has netted $36,422?since?January 2023.
>>> 
>>> BBI?s Mission:
>>> Facilitate cultural exchange and promote meaningful social interaction 
>>> between city and suburban families
>>> 
>>> Learn more about the Boston Business Initiative here:
>>> 
>>> https://bostonbridgesinitiative.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ?Warmly,
>>> Joanna Owen Schmergel?
>>> 617-645-9059
>>> [email protected]
>>> pronouns: she/her/hers
>>> The Boston Bridges Initiative, a 501(c)(3)
>>> 
>>> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)
>>> 
>>> Boston Bridges Initiative?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |  |  |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |  |
>>> Boston Bridges Initiative
>>> 
>>> 
>>> |  |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (The Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) program was 
>>> originally started by the 501(c)(3) organization, Friends of Lincoln METCO, 
>>> Lincoln METCO Coordinating Committee, in Lincoln, MA, and raised $170,000 
>>> from 2017 to 2022).
>>> 
>>> As seen on?WBZ CBS News Boston:
>>> 
>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/boston...
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/8da0ece4/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_4109.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 2917441 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/8da0ece4/attachment-0001.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 8
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:48:24 -0500
>>> From: Scott Clary <[email protected]>
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CA+ZAMmfOVLgH+PLyC6bmNpa1d=gfrAnfu6hMAce=ryptpgy...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln!
>>> 
>>> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button.
>>> 
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> 
>>> Scott Clary
>>> 617-968-5769
>>> 
>>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am
>>>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they
>>>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis.
>>>> 
>>>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they
>>>> keep coming. Help admin!
>>>> 
>>>> Donald
>>>> 
>>>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf of John
>>>> Mendelson <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM
>>>> *To:* LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject:* [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>>> 
>>>> We are all lucky to live here.  Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA
>>>> chatter on Lincoln Talk?
>>>> 
>>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it.
>>>> 
>>>> John
>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
>>>> .
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/b7c1747d/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 9
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:54:19 -0500
>>> From: V Saleme <[email protected]>
>>> To: Scott Clary <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CAJDdKYHrwDWXCP=Tsrb31iPrSSsbe=mhkv1tfimickxb9wz...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Thanks and happy Thanksgiving to you as well Scott and everyone else!
>>> 
>>> Vic
>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:48?AM Scott Clary <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln!
>>>> 
>>>> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete
>>>> button.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Scott Clary
>>>> 617-968-5769
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am
>>>>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they
>>>>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they
>>>>> keep coming. Help admin!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Donald
>>>>> 
>>>>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf of John
>>>>> Mendelson <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM
>>>>> *To:* LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> We are all lucky to live here.  Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA
>>>>> chatter on Lincoln Talk?
>>>>> 
>>>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
>>>> .
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/72e1b7e1/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 10
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:07:48 +0000
>>> From: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> To: Scott Clary <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  
>>> <bl1pr14mb5046706c9c74be62d1c385c8ca...@bl1pr14mb5046.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
>>> 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>> 
>>> You might be happily retired. Speak for yourself. 200 plus emails a week 
>>> packed in with desirable emails becomes a full-time job. One suitable for a 
>>> retired person sipping a cup of Joe in the morning.
>>> 
>>> It always amuses me when people cannot see beyond themselves. On this 
>>> Thanksgiving Day, not because you don?t have a problem, that does not mean 
>>> that someone else does not.
>>> 
>>> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Scott Clary <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 10:48:24 AM
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>; LincolnTalk 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> 
>>> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln!
>>> 
>>> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button.
>>> 
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> 
>>> Scott Clary
>>> 617-968-5769
>>> 
>>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca 
>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am 
>>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they 
>>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis.
>>> 
>>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they 
>>> keep coming. Help admin!
>>> 
>>> Donald
>>> 
>>> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Lincoln 
>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>> on behalf of John Mendelson 
>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM
>>> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> 
>>> We are all lucky to live here.  Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA 
>>> chatter on Lincoln Talk?
>>> 
>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to 
>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/d628ed5a/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 11
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:48:01 -0500
>>> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]>
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Scott Clary <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/f2f9d11e/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 12
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: Joanna Owen Schmergel <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] FS: For Sale for BBI: Correia Art Glass perfume
>>>  bottle with top, 6? tall, handmade & signed $65
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Give the gift of?art this holiday season while supporting a worthy cause!?
>>> Easy, convenient?shopping right here in Lincoln!?
>>> Just 3?weeks left to shop before we shut down for the holidays!!?
>>> Now even?MORE price?reductions!?
>>> We have a $40,000?goal by December 15th!!!
>>> We have $3,578?more to go!!?
>>> And we are STILL taking donations!!?
>>> See all of our available?listings here!?
>>> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh
>>> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, 
>>> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups 
>>> including Lincoln:?
>>> For the woman who has everything:?
>>> Correia Art Glass perfume bottle with top, 6? tall, handmade & signed?
>>> Finest art glass in the world!?
>>> Signed and in perfect condition!!?
>>>> From a very generous Lincoln donor
>>> Our Price: $65
>>> 
>>> Please see the link below for more photos:
>>> Correia Art Glass Perfume bottle with top - arts & crafts - by owner - sale 
>>> - craigslist?
>>> 
>>> |  
>>> |   
>>> |   
>>> |   |    |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |  
>>> |   |  
>>> Correia Art Glass Perfume bottle with top - arts &#38; crafts - by owner - 
>>> sale - craigslist
>>> 
>>> For sale, with 100% of all proceeds going to the Boston Bridges Initiative, 
>>> a 501(c)3 here in the Boston MetroWest supporting all METCO groups 
>>> including Lincoln: Correia Art Glass perfume bottle...
>>> |   |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please check out other artwork for sale on our?Facebook Marketplace page:
>>> https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/548801771/?ref=permalink&tab=listings&mibextid=6ojiHh
>>> 
>>> Please call Joanna Schmergel to purchase?at?617-645-9059. Pickup at 18 
>>> Cerulean Way. ?
>>> 
>>> *Giant dog is friendly?
>>> 
>>> Serious inquiries only please.?
>>> 
>>> ?All sales are final and all items are sold ?As Is?.
>>> 
>>> These items are cross-posted for sale on other sites.?
>>> 
>>> Payment in cash,?check or credit card on site
>>> 
>>> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)?Boston Bridges Initiative 
>>> has netted $36,422?since?January 2023.
>>> 
>>> BBI?s Mission:
>>> Facilitate cultural exchange and promote meaningful social interaction 
>>> between city and suburban families
>>> 
>>> Learn more about the Boston Business Initiative here:
>>> 
>>> https://bostonbridgesinitiative.org/
>>> ?Warmly,
>>> Joanna Owen Schmergel?
>>> 617-645-9059
>>> [email protected]
>>> pronouns: she/her/hers
>>> The Boston Bridges Initiative, a 501(c)(3)
>>> 
>>> Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together)
>>> 
>>> Boston Bridges Initiative?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |  |  |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |  |
>>> Boston Bridges Initiative
>>> 
>>> 
>>> |  |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> |
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (The Downsize for Diversity ART (Anti-Racist Together) program was 
>>> originally started by the 501(c)(3) organization, Friends of Lincoln METCO, 
>>> Lincoln METCO Coordinating Committee, in Lincoln, MA, and raised $170,000 
>>> from 2017 to 2022).
>>> 
>>> As seen on?WBZ CBS News Boston:
>>> 
>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/boston...
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/c1fac885/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_4126.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 2739725 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/c1fac885/attachment-0001.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 13
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:00:00 -0500
>>> From: Ran Cronin <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] December Happenings at the Lincoln Public
>>>  Library
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <cah+owxgikrtponkwqcjio3avfzvukwlkkfr+s_b4wfm00vx...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Here are just a few of the many events happening at LPL in December:
>>> 
>>> The Nutcracker: A Preview
>>> 
>>> Friday, December 1, 4-5 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-nutcracker-a-preview-3/>Join
>>> us for a reading of The Nutcracker geared to young children accompanied by
>>> dancers from the Commonwealth Ballet Company acting out some of the parts.
>>> Children get to meet the dancers after the reading.
>>> 
>>> The Boston Tea Party: A ?What Was? Book Discussion!
>>> 
>>> Wednesday, December 6, 3-4 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-boston-tea-party-a-what-was-book-discussion/>
>>> 
>>> Celebrate "America's 250!" Join us for a discussion of the book What Was
>>> the Boston Tea Party? to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the notorious
>>> Dec 16, 1773 event. Books will be available at the Children's Desk to be
>>> read in advance. This event is perfect for families interested in history.
>>> Best for ages 6+ but anyone is welcome. Discussion, craft, and light
>>> refreshments served. Registration is limited to 30 for this
>>> discussion. Register
>>> here
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/the-boston-tea-party-a-what-was-book-discussion/>
>>> !
>>> 
>>> VIRTUAl Boston Tea Party at the 250th Anniversary
>>> 
>>> Thursday, December 7, 7-8 PM, Register for Zoom Link
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/virtual-boston-tea-party-at-the-250th-anniversary/>This
>>> year marks the 250th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, a political
>>> protest that occurred on December 16, 1773 in Boston. Bringing vividly to
>>> life the diverse array of people and places that the Tea Party brought
>>> together ? from Chinese tea-pickers to English businessmen, Native American
>>> tribes, sugar plantation slaves, and Boston?s ladies of leisure ?
>>> Professor Benjamin
>>> L. Carp will share with us how a determined group of New Englanders shook
>>> the foundations of the British Empire, and what this has meant for
>>> Americans since.
>>> 
>>> Benjamin L. Carp is the Daniel M. Lyons Professor of American History at
>>> Brooklyn College and teaches at the Graduate Center of the City University
>>> of New York. His latest book is The Great New York Fire of 1776: A Lost
>>> Story of the American Revolution. He also wrote Defiance of the Patriots:
>>> The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America (Yale, 2010), which won the
>>> Cox Book Prize from the Society of the Cincinnati in 2013, and Rebels
>>> Rising: Cities and the American Revolution (Oxford, 2007). Register here!
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/virtual-boston-tea-party-at-the-250th-anniversary/>
>>> 
>>> LOMA Open Mike featuring Geoff Goodhue & Friends
>>> 
>>> Tuesday, December 12, 7-10 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/loma-open-mike-featuring-geoff-goodhue-friends/>Raised
>>> in Boxford, Massachusetts, Geoff graduated from Ohio University in 2004
>>> with a B.F.A. in Percussion Performance and currently lives in Jackson, New
>>> Hampshire. His family outfit, The Goodhues Band, was featured at the 2016
>>> Mountain Laurel Autoharp Gathering. Come listen to Geoff and his friends!
>>> LOMA is a monthly open mike night event. For a slot, performers should
>>> email Rich Eilbert at [email protected] (before noon of the open-mike day)
>>> or sign up at the event.
>>> 
>>> Gingerbread Fun!
>>> 
>>> Wednesday, December 12, 4-5:30 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/gingerbread-fun-2/>Get
>>> into the holiday spirit with gingerbread stories and cookie decorating! All
>>> materials will be provided. Intended for children aged 5+. Register is
>>> required. Register by emailing [email protected].
>>> 
>>> VIRTUAL Brain Health with Dr. Jonathan Rosand
>>> 
>>> Thursday, December 14, 7-8 PM, Register for Zoom Link
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/brain-health-with-dr-jonathan-rosand/>Join
>>> us for a talk about brain health with Critical Care Neurologist Jonathan
>>> Rosand, MD. Dr. Rosand?s talk will focus on brain care and brain health
>>> prevention, with a specific focus on lifestyle behaviors and modifications
>>> that can help one delay or prevent the incidence of dementia and late in
>>> life depression. He?s spoken about this topic many times over the years,
>>> and will have a series of slides to share and time for questions at the
>>> end. Register here!
>>> 
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/brain-health-with-dr-jonathan-rosand/>
>>> 
>>> A Gathering of Celtic and Christmas with Jeff Snow
>>> 
>>> Friday, December 15, 12:30-1:30 PM at Bemis Hall, Council on Aging & Health
>>> Services
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/a-gathering-of-celtic-and-christmas-with-jeff-snow/>Join
>>> us for a celebration of Celtic and Christmas music at Bemis Hall, Council
>>> on Aging & Health Services! Jeff Snow is a talented multi-instrumentalist
>>> who plays the music and tells the stories behind the songs. He plays six
>>> and twelve string guitar, autoharp, Celtic Bouzouki & Bodhran. Learn more
>>> about Jeff?s music at his website, jeffsnow.net, and come hear him play!
>>> 
>>> Lincoln Film Society Presents The Icestorm (1997, R)
>>> 
>>> Thursday, December 21, 6-8 PM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/lincoln-library-film-society-64/>
>>> 
>>> ?In the 1970s, an outwardly wholesome family begins cracking at the seams
>>> over the course of a tumultuous Thanksgiving break. Frustrated with his
>>> job, the father, Ben (Kevin Kline), seeks fulfillment by cheating on his
>>> wife, Elena (Joan Allen), with neighborhood seductress Janey (Sigourney
>>> Weaver).  The family's strained relations continue to tighten until an ice
>>> storm strikes.? Some films may not be suitable for patrons under the age of
>>> 16. Sign up for the mailing list here
>>> <https://c45b8245.sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAGC-bWE9p6L6ouTPFdRYv4UT7Ul5jXigcFFTvq1jtppHhQdYAdo2C40AdxHsVn993vxhMwlRKfkOVFQumgxrJbYLbDjxuo1eUT_des9jgZPq0VWsY118_x16XBUmUEZ5upGYah59OdZkI6eYm5Hg0YH9_ZtkCKx_tsrnrnLx_kNHwDQIMyex37rE4q4hWApA-_hCsiEeC5x4>
>>> .
>>> 
>>> Winter Musics and Muffins
>>> 
>>> Friday, December 29, 10:30-11 AM, Tarbell Room, Lincoln Public Library
>>> <https://lincolnpl.assabetinteractive.com/calendar/winter-movies-and-muffins-3/>
>>> 
>>> Come watch winter themed film versions of classic picture books and enjoy
>>> muffins and juice. Intended for children ages 2+. No registration required.
>>> 
>>> Looking for more events at the Library?
>>> 
>>> Library Linc <https://loom.ly/MSCnfGE> is our new weekly e-newsletter.
>>> Subscribe to keep up to date on our latest events, services, and news every
>>> Friday!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Ran Cronin
>>> Assistant Director
>>> Lincoln Public Library <https://www.lincolnpl.org/>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/bb84d581/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 14
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:59:53 -0500
>>> From: Stephen Dirrane <[email protected]>
>>> To: Edwina Lincoln <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Free stone dust
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>> 
>>> Hello LincolnTalk,
>>> 
>>> It?s been an age old tradition in our family to give out stone dust on 
>>> Thanksgiving. We have 2-3 yards or prime Cavechios stone dust, buttery 
>>> smooth, which we?d love to share, just as the Wampanoag shared with the 
>>> Pilgrims.
>>> 
>>> Either email or text me at  (978) 369-0024 if interested. And have a lovely 
>>> Thanksgiving.
>>> 
>>> Kind regards
>>> Stephen Dirrane
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 15
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:38:20 -0500
>>> From: Edward Young <[email protected]>
>>> To: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>  project?
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Andy Wang wrote of my post about the Select Board?s November 16 mailing: 
>>> ?Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing 
>>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent. "
>>> 
>>> But the PROMINENCE with which the various numbers are presented to the 
>>> voters is the ENTIRE point of my post. Why are the most important numbers 
>>> buried, or not included at all, and an extraneous number highlighted?
>>> 
>>> In fuller detail:
>>> 
>>> 1. The information most critical to town citizens about the tax effects of 
>>> each of the three proposals they are being asked to vote upon, which have 
>>> proposed costs of $12.5M, $18.75M and $25M respectively, is presumably what 
>>> percentage increases in their taxes are estimated for each price point. 
>>> That is certainly the first thing I would want to know. These percentages 
>>> are nowhere disclosed in the mailing. Why were these numbers not the 
>>> numbers most prominently set forth? Why were they not included at all?
>>> 
>>> 2. Yes, a useful way of illustrating these percentage increases would be to 
>>> translate them into dollar amounts for a Lincoln home of median value. But 
>>> the fourth page merely says ?TAX IMPACT: Up to $773 increase,? ?TAX IMPACT: 
>>> Up to $541 increase,? and ?TAX IMPACT: Up to $387 increase? without saying 
>>> that these numbers are for a median home and that for half the town 
>>> residents the dollar amount would necessarily be larger than the ?Up to? 
>>> amount. Also it is not disclosed there that the increase would be in effect 
>>> for decades, not for a single year. Why was not clearer language such as 
>>> ?ANNUAL TAX IMPACT FOR MEDIAN HOME? used instead of  ?TAX IMPACT: Up to 
>>> $773 increase?? Doesn?t that wording imply that nobody would have an 
>>> increase greater than $773?
>>> 
>>> 3. Later on, you can find a reference that the tax impact number is per 
>>> median home if you read the tiny type on the fifth page. This illustrates 
>>> my point about prominence of disclosure.
>>> 
>>> 4. Later on, the sixth page sets forth tables of numbers for hypothetical 
>>> amounts of borrowings at price points that bear no relation to the proposed 
>>> costs for the project, so that voters must calculate the necessary 
>>> adjustments to the real numbers for themselves, assuming that the entire 
>>> cost of the project is to be bonded and the debt service paid entirely by 
>>> future taxes. How does using hypothetical amounts rather than the actual 
>>> proposed amounts aid the readers? understanding? And why is the 
>>> hypothetical dollar amount, which is far less than any of the proposed 
>>> project costs, the one that gets highlighted by itself in the left hand 
>>> column? Voters don?t need to know the dollar amount for a hypothetical 
>>> $10M, they need to know the actual dollar amounts for the actual price 
>>> points they are voting on.
>>> 
>>> 5. There is a reference to a "Stabilization balance" of $5.5M but no 
>>> explanation is provided as to what this term means or how it relates to the 
>>> cost of the project. If it is meant to imply that some portion of the 
>>> project cost may be paid out of existing town funds, it should also be 
>>> pointed out that those funds came from past taxes and that any other uses 
>>> to which they would otherwise have been put would need to be funded from 
>>> future taxes.
>>> 
>>> 6. One would expect that the most important information for voters would be 
>>> highlighted by presenting it (for example) in the largest type size, in 
>>> boldface, on the stand-alone page with lots of white space that is 
>>> captioned ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT.? Instead, the ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT? page 
>>> does not mention either the estimated percentage increases in everybody?s 
>>> tax bill or the estimated dollar amounts for a median home; instead, the 
>>> dollar amount most prominently displayed on the ?ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT? page 
>>> is a number for the tax impact of servicing a hypothetical amount of debt 
>>> ($10M) that is lower than any of the costs proposed for the project 
>>> ($12.5M. $18.75M and $25M). Please explain why that number is highlighted 
>>> while some (but not all) of the numbers corresponding to the actual 
>>> proposed costs are set forth elsewhere in smaller non-bold type on densely 
>>> packed pages and without any of the necessary explanation provided on the 
>>> later pages.
>>> 
>>> Those are the kinds of questions that I know the Securities and Exchange 
>>> Commission staff would raise if a company presented numbers in a draft of a 
>>> document in the manner presented in the November 16 mailing. The SEC folks 
>>> definitely recognize that the prominence with which data catches the 
>>> reader?s eye, and the orderliness with which the information is presented, 
>>> is every bit as important as whether everything gets printed in small print 
>>> somewhere in the document. (And of course the estimated percentage 
>>> increases in everybody?s tax bill are not presented at all).
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/7fb55c7b/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 16
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:04:16 -0500
>>> From: Karla Gravis <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>  project?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CAPP=LegkTOeO-4TuUyZ2V4_0u4jZSb-D1WRR-A1m=vojkzq...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> ?(?) just pointing out that the values seem to be properly labeled and
>>> consistent.?  is quoted in the email below.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately, this is *not* correct. The first page that the tax impact is
>>> mentioned (attached below) very clearly says that the tax impact will be
>>> ?up to $773/$541$/$387 increase? with no footnote nor comment on that page
>>> that indicates this is for the median home value. The font is much bigger
>>> than anywhere else.
>>> 
>>> Anyone reading this page would expect their tax impact to not be more than
>>> those numbers. It is not enough to have it elsewhere in the document, there
>>> should be a footnote any time a tax impact is mentioned.
>>> 
>>> A retraction or clarification from the CCBC is overdue.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:17
>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>> project?
>>>> To: Edward Young <[email protected]>
>>>> CC: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as
>>>> 'Estimated tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also
>>>> for the FY23 Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of
>>>> $17,488), so it will vary based on individual home prices.   There is also
>>>> the chart on the right of that same slide that provides details on the
>>>> impact based on how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M,
>>>> $20M, $25M) of a CC.  I believe this chart was provided by FinCom.
>>>> 
>>>> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are
>>>> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the
>>>> three designs.  It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the
>>>> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center.
>>>> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your
>>>> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g.
>>>> 
>>>> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing
>>>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent.
>>>> 
>>>> - Andy (not the FinCom one...)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected tax
>>>>> impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently
>>>>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s
>>>>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact?  is far LOWER
>>>>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the proposals,
>>>>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board
>>>>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to 
>>>>> $773
>>>>> increase,? depending on the size of the project.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading
>>>>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, 
>>>>> on
>>>>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of 
>>>>> ?up
>>>>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are
>>>>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed
>>>>> information.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission
>>>>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with
>>>>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in
>>>>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Edward Young
>>>>> Bedford Road
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
>>>> .
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/5d6f8f04/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_5450.jpg
>>> Type: image/jpg
>>> Size: 985832 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/5d6f8f04/attachment-0001.jpg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 17
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:23:13 -0500
>>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]>
>>> To: Karla Gravis <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>  project?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <caefvrnfeohxjcvlb8+nvtzhlassxlogesetzc06yswnt7lu...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Nope, you're correct. The values reported on that page are insufficiently
>>> labeled. I missed that page and stand corrected.
>>> 
>>> - Andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 3:04?PM Karla Gravis <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ?(?) just pointing out that the values seem to be properly labeled and
>>>> consistent.?  is quoted in the email below.
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately, this is *not* correct. The first page that the tax impact
>>>> is mentioned (attached below) very clearly says that the tax impact will be
>>>> ?up to $773/$541$/$387 increase? with no footnote nor comment on that page
>>>> that indicates this is for the median home value. The font is much bigger
>>>> than anywhere else.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyone reading this page would expect their tax impact to not be more than
>>>> those numbers. It is not enough to have it elsewhere in the document, there
>>>> should be a footnote any time a tax impact is mentioned.
>>>> 
>>>> A retraction or clarification from the CCBC is overdue.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>> From: Andy Wang <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:17
>>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] What is the REAL tax increase for the CC
>>>>> project?
>>>>> To: Edward Young <[email protected]>
>>>>> CC: Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The $291-$309 value you're referencing on that page is stated as
>>>>> 'Estimated tax impact *per $10 mil borrowed*'. That dollar value is also
>>>>> for the FY23 Median Home Value ($1,259,900, which has a median tax bill of
>>>>> $17,488), so it will vary based on individual home prices.   There is also
>>>>> the chart on the right of that same slide that provides details on the
>>>>> impact based on how much is borrowed at multiple price points ($10M, $15M,
>>>>> $20M, $25M) of a CC.  I believe this chart was provided by FinCom.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The other numbers you point out ($387 - $773 for the median tax bill) are
>>>>> for the prices that CCBC has estimated ($12.5M, $18.75M, $24.01M) for the
>>>>> three designs.  It looks like they also used the median tax bill and the
>>>>> upper $309 value, just scaled to the actual price of the community center.
>>>>> Note, again these are based on median home price ($1,259,900), so if your
>>>>> property is more or less than that, it will scale accordingly (e.g.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not going to argue on the 'prominence' of the presentation, just pointing
>>>>> out that the values seem to be properly labeled and consistent.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Andy (not the FinCom one...)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:20?AM Edward Young via Lincoln <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Be aware that the average $291-$309 per year number for the projected
>>>>>> tax impact of the Community Center project, as you will see prominently
>>>>>> displayed to catch your eye on the sixth page of the Select Board?s
>>>>>> November 16 mailing under the heading ?Estimated Tax Impact?  is far 
>>>>>> LOWER
>>>>>> than ANY of the actually projected tax increases for ANY of the 
>>>>>> proposals,
>>>>>> as set forth in small type on the fourth page of the same Select Board
>>>>>> mailing. The actual number ranges from ?up to $387 increase? to ?up to 
>>>>>> $773
>>>>>> increase,? depending on the size of the project.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The $291-309 number is printed in large boldface type, and the heading
>>>>>> ?Estimated Tax Impact? above it is printed in even larger boldface type, 
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> a page with lots of white space. In contrast, the actual projections of 
>>>>>> ?up
>>>>>> to $387 increase," ?up to $541 increase,? and ?up to $773 increase? are
>>>>>> printed in smaller, non-boldface type on a page of densely packed
>>>>>> information.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Based on decades of responding to Securities and Exchange Commission
>>>>>> comments on clients? drafts of securities law filings, I can say with
>>>>>> confidence that the SEC would never allow a company to present numbers in
>>>>>> the manner chosen for the Select Board?s mailing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Edward Young
>>>>>> Bedford Road
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/3bf5e955/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_5450.jpg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 985832 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/3bf5e955/attachment-0001.jpg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 18
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:13:35 -0500
>>> From: Cris Ratiner <[email protected]>
>>> To: LincolnTalk Listserve <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Posting for teenager:  kids books for sale
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> Hi Lincoln,
>>> 
>>> My son, now a sophisticated high schooler, has pared through his voluminous 
>>> bookshelves.  He would like to make a few dollars toward his school band 
>>> trip and offers the following collections for a small amount.  I can vouch 
>>> for the fact that these are all in good condition, having been read once at 
>>> most.  (Full disclosure: we have a dog, but no cats or mold in the house).  
>>> 
>>> Happy Thanksgiving!
>>> 
>>> Cris Ratiner
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> GERONIMO STILTON COLLECTION:  $35
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1573.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 207270 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0008.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> MO WILLEMS trilogy:   $5
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1572.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 180528 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0009.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> COLLECTION OF NEWBURY AWARD WINNERS and/or. NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLERS:  $45
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1571.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 228211 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0010.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ARTEMIS FOWL SET. $5
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1570.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 194609 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0011.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> DRAGON MASTERS COLLECTION:  $5
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1569.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 219283 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0012.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> LLOYD ALEXANDER SET:  $8
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1568.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 122349 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0013.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> WINGS OF FIRE SERIES:  $8
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1567.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 145203 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0014.jpeg>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> MARCH TRILOGY:  $8
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_1566.jpeg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 173440 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/4a9d5615/attachment-0015.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 19
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:22:23 -0500
>>> From: Anne Warner <[email protected]>
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Scott Clary <[email protected]>, LincolnTalk
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/b0037711/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 20
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: Terri <[email protected]>
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>,  Sara Mattes
>>>  <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Happy Thanksgiving Lincoln!?
>>> I'd like to sprinkle alittle humor into this conversation..... so I'll tag 
>>> onto Sara's "One Fell Swoop" comment with a hilarious skit from my favorite 
>>> comedian.. Nate Borgatze.? Enjoy... don't worry no profanities!
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldwfL1gJ4jw
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Terri Kafina. :)
>>>>  On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:48:19 AM EST, Sara Mattes 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:  
>>> 
>>> I suggest you put LincolnTalk in the search function, scan and delete in 
>>> one fell swoop.In the alternative, subscribe for the digest format and it 
>>> will arrive as a package- easy to digest?as I pray the meal we will 
>>> probably stuff ourselves with is too.?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 23, 2023, at 11:08 AM, Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ?
>>> You might be happily retired. Speak for yourself. 200 plus emails a week 
>>> packed in with desirable emails becomes a full-time job. One suitable for a 
>>> retired person sipping a cup of Joe in the morning.?
>>> It always amuses me when people cannot see beyond themselves. On this 
>>> Thanksgiving Day, not because you don?t have a problem, that does not mean 
>>> that someone else does not.?
>>> Get Outlook for iOSFrom: Scott Clary <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 10:48:24 AM
>>> To: Donald Fonseca <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: John Mendelson <[email protected]>; LincolnTalk 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln?Happy Thanksgiving 
>>> Lincoln!
>>> We all have the the ability to not open an email and hit the delete button.?
>>> 
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> 
>>> Scott Clary
>>> 617-968-5769
>>> 
>>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors???
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 10:56 PM Donald Fonseca <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I second that. Between the bias war talk, HCA, and the CC, I am 
>>> overwhelmed. This is made worst by certain individuals who thing they 
>>> should send multiple emails, often in bold, on a daily basis.?
>>> I have opted to unsubscribe and I have confirmation of the same yet they 
>>> keep coming. Help admin!
>>> Donald
>>> Get Outlook for iOSFrom: Lincoln <[email protected]> on 
>>> behalf of John Mendelson <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 8:48:56 PM
>>> To: LincolnTalk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Thankful to live in Lincoln?We are all lucky to live 
>>> here.? Now, how about a nice 4-day break from HCA chatter on Lincoln Talk?
>>> My in-box and peace of mind could use it.
>>> John--
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/e1b16c97/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 21
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:40:02 -0600
>>> From: Richard Theriault <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] For Sale: Men?s MOTO snowboard boots size 11.5.
>>>  Very good condition. $40
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <CAGhv85Cg3FY8PGAOsTPo7eVE5h-W490AWY=wwgvynimzaor...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Hi LT,
>>> 
>>> If interested you can send me a text at 617 438 4315 or email me at
>>> [email protected].
>>> 
>>> Thnx
>>> 
>>> Rich
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/1abedd58/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: IMG_3787.jpg
>>> Type: image/jpeg
>>> Size: 633892 bytes
>>> Desc: not available
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/1abedd58/attachment-0001.jpg>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 22
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 09:22:00 -0500
>>> From: Bijoy Misra <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] non-turkey Thanksgiving
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <calw-kjustn-rkpsevibn7gzgqfon4uq4095sz+ogrutfhyc...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Dear friends,,
>>> In this town of Lincoln, I am a minority Hindu of Indian descent.
>>> Hindu is not a prescriptive religion, it is an empirical belief system
>>> of acknowledgement.  That our existence is a blessing of myriads
>>> of other objects and cosmos is the acknowledgement.  I will
>>> complete twenty years of my residence in Lincoln next April.
>>> I thank you all for being good friends, wise neighbors, loving
>>> elders and analytic young professionals. Above all, I thank you
>>> all for the deep respect to the ground, to the earth.  The ground
>>> is the core teacher of Hinduism. We dig it, we tear it and it still
>>> blesses us with food and shelter.  It's the Mother.  Let us continue
>>> to respect the ground in our own way.  Let the ground continue to
>>> bless us with her trees, herbs, flowers, animals, birds and insects.  .
>>> Happy Thanksgiving.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bijoy Misra
>>> Bedford Road
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231123/f46b0cc8/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 23
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:42:51 -0500
>>> From: Sara Mattes <[email protected]>
>>> To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [LincolnTalk] For Decades, Southern States Considered
>>>  Thanksgiving an Act of Northern Aggression
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> And we thought our debates over the Community Center and HCA zoning were 
>>> heated, pumpkin pie seems to have out done us.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For Decades, Southern States Considered Thanksgiving an Act of Northern 
>>> Aggression
>>> In the 19th century, pumpkin pie ignited a culture war.
>>> 
>>> https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/thanksgiving-pumpkin-pie-culture-war?utm_source=share_by_email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mailto_share
>>> 
>>> ------
>>> Sara Mattes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/attachments/20231124/7d59be9f/attachment-0001.htm>
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>> 
>>> --
>>> This is the DIGEST of the LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> End of Lincoln Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33
>>> ****************************************
>> 
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to