This subject is of considerable concern for us all. 

> On Aug 27, 2024, at 9:01 AM, Joan Kimball <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Sara. Exactly my sentiments. This piece by Brinkley was about the 
> dangers facing Walden, a beautiful, historical place.  And jet expansion at 
> Hanscom is of concern not only because of threats to our precious places but 
> also, and especially,  to increasing climate change.  
> 
> Joan
> 
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 8:50 AM Sara Mattes <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> There will be a dramatic increase in private ( large, as in 737s) jet traffic.
> The proposed hangers are not to house aircraft already parked at Hanscom!
> It is to expand capacity.
> It is a money maker.
> To do so, hundreds of trees will be cut, reducing tree canopy, canopy that 
> are like a set of lungs, and also provide shade/ cooling.
> In its place, acres and acres or tarmac- absorbing and reflecting heat from 
> the sun.
> Those planes are PRIVATE jets, designed to carry one to a very few passengers.
> The impact on the many and the environment to accommodate the few is YUGE.
> 
> I suggest you read the expect testimony/ comments in response to the EIR- all 
> publicly available.
> 
> European countries have determined such private aircraft undermine all 
> efforts to address climate change and air quality and thus have banned such 
> aircraft from domestic flights.
> This is a move to protect all and future generations.
> 
> Finally, there has been a complete misunderstanding of the Brinkley/ Walden 
> piece- it was not a straightforward news report.
> It should have been obvious Thai it was a Op Ed…one noted historian’s view of 
> the impacts of the proposed expansion on a national treasure.
> Brinkley was pointing out the irony.
> I urge all to revisit a lovely video again.
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> > On Aug 26, 2024, at 11:41 PM, [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I too was taken by the lack of objective journalism by CBS. In addition to 
> > what Vic mentioned the Hansom issues were wildly inflated. The construction 
> > issue aside. I’m taking no position on that, additional hangers will result 
> > in planes being housed inside instead of outside and not necessarily any 
> > additional traffic.
> > 
> > A brief (1 min.) example of current media credibility:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqvkCF64mDY 
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqvkCF64mDY>
> > --
> > The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> > To post, send mail to [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
> > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
> > <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
> > Change your subscription settings at 
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
> > <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
> > 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to