Except that luxury housing *does* free up other housing. The article I
linked earlier (
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119022001048#bib0015)
empirically shows that with data. And this makes intuitive sense too. If
I'm in the market for a home and have $1 million to spend, I'd rather have
a newer, more luxurious condo, but if an older, less nice unit is all
that's available, I'll take that lesser unit, driving up its price.

-Nick Gardner

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 7:37 PM Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps Lincoln and other places can step up with more true affordability?
> Luxury CIVCO condos at the Mall and at Panetta/ Farrington are not going
> to free up other housing for low or moderate income folks.
>
> (Btw- the article link is behind a paywall)
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 13, 2025, at 4:59 PM, Margaret Olson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 
> I’m wondering why you think the laws of supply and demand do not apply to
> housing?
>
> When there is a very significant housing shortage (as there is now in
> Massachusetts) you do need a significant increase in supply before the
> people on the lower end of the economic scale see any relief. So long as
> there are far more people looking for housing than there are units
> available, competition drives prices upward—whether in rent or purchase
> prices. When housing construction increases substantially the pressure on
> rents at the high and middle ends of the market begins to ease. See
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119021000656
>
> The housing crisis doesn’t mean supply and demand have stopped
> functioning—it means the imbalance is so large that it takes a substantial
> increase in supply before its benefits reach everyone.
> Margaret
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 4:37 PM Ruth Ann Hendrickson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Sarah. If you open up a parcel of land for housing,
>> developers, want to make their maximum profitability for that piece of
>> land, and that means high-end condos.
>>
>> Ruth Ann
>> (She, her, hers)
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2025, at 3:44 PM, Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The free market principles of supply and demand, in housing, don’t work
>> for lower income and even moderate income folks.
>> That is why we have 40b- the stick- and the carrots of public subsidies
>> of housing and public housing.
>> Re-zoning, without strict demands to produce a true mix, leaves many out
>> in the cold.
>> The current push for rezone in MA/ “transit oriented development “ is a
>> boom, a gift to for profit developers and a bust for low- and moderate
>> income families.
>> The MBTA/ rezoning stripped towns like Lincoln from enforcing existing
>> affordability requirements and have handed a great gift to for- profit
>> developers.
>> Let’s keep our eye on the Mall as the die is cast.
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2025, at 8:13 AM, Nick Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> I think the best way to understand it is simply supply and demand. The
>> supply for housing simply has not gone up at the same rate as demand. (1)
>> In general, economists agree that the solution is relatively simple, build
>> more. Ideally we'd build a good mix of housing from new single family
>> homes, to projects with a high percentage of affordable units, to market
>> rate "luxury" apartments. But even if we only built market rate "luxury"
>> apartments, studies have shown that the availability of new market rate
>> housing results in moving chains that serve to relatively quickly relieve
>> pressure on other segments of the market (2). Happy to discuss the
>> economics of this more if people would like, it's an area I've spent a lot
>> of time in over the last few years.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nick Gardner
>>
>>
>> 1:
>> https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/new-england-public-policy-center-policy-report/2025/new-englands-housing-markets-supply-and-demand-factors-affecting-housing-prices-across-the-region.aspx
>> 2:
>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119022001048#bib0015
>>
>> Note: I put luxury in quotes, because a lot of the new market rate
>> housing isn't really high end, it's just newer. The same way that a 2010
>> Prius is cheaper than a 2025 one, housing has some level of depreciation
>> relative to the broader market. Any new build, with brand new appliances,
>> updated layouts, modern amenities, is simply going to be able to charge
>> more, even if it's not actually luxury. A lot of the "luxury" touches tend
>> to be things like LVP flooring and basic stainless steel appliances.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:18 AM Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Trickle down economics?
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2025, at 8:59 PM, Nick Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> > But, we need to understand what the market is seeking.
>>>
>>> The free market is usually pretty good at that. Developers tend to build
>>> properties because they will make money.
>>>
>>> > Do families want to move to a town like Lincoln to live in multistory
>>> units?
>>>
>>> Probably! But developers tend to do that sort of research before
>>> spending millions on a new development.
>>>
>>> > Many families, in order to have more of the traditional single family
>>> home, are moving further and further out.
>>> It is not just cost, but what is seen as desirable.
>>> Can we better explore the type of units that will meet wants and needs,
>>>  and not just numbers.
>>>
>>> The issue is simply that single family houses take up a lot of land, and
>>> land plus transport are the true determining factors here. I can't get a
>>> single family home in manhattan because there simply isn't the land for it.
>>> As the population of the greater Boston area goes up, there will be less
>>> and less places close to Boston that can sustain affordable single family
>>> detached homes on sizable lots.
>>>
>>> > I look at Denver that has built many, many multi-story units that are
>>> going vacant, while families push further and further away from the city.
>>> The urban sprawl is stressing municipal services and water resources.
>>>
>>> Great thing about multi-family homes is that they put much less stress
>>> on things like water resources and municipal services than new single
>>> family home developments do. I'm not worried about vacant housing right
>>> now, given how big of a housing crisis there is in the area. Plus, new
>>> developments pay large amounts of fees and property taxes towards
>>> maintaining and upgrading aging municipal services.
>>>
>>> Simply put, there's only so much land within a decent transit or drive
>>> of Boston/Cambridge, where many people have jobs they need to get to. So
>>> this constrains how far away people will live, and we just need to build
>>> more housing. The best way to do that is to build housing across the whole
>>> spectrum. More multi-family multi-story developments, more rowhomes, more
>>> ADUs, more splitting of lots to build second homes on the lot, and more
>>> development of vacant lots. Ideally some of those units will be affordable
>>> by design, but the best path towards affordability is simply more housing,
>>> however we can get it.
>>>
>>> -Nick Gardner
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 8:46 PM Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes!
>>>> But, we need to understand what the market is seeking.
>>>> Do families want to move to a town like Lincoln to live in multistory
>>>> units?
>>>> We don’t know.
>>>> Many families, in order to have more of the traditional single family
>>>> home, are moving further and further out.
>>>> It is not just cost, but what is seen as desirable.
>>>> Can we better explore the type of units that will meet wants and needs,
>>>>  and not just numbers.
>>>>
>>>> I look at Denver that has built many, many multi-story units that are
>>>> going vacant, while families push further and further away from the city.
>>>> The urban sprawl is stressing municipal services and water resources.
>>>>
>>>> How do meet desire with creativity?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 12, 2025, at 6:52 PM, Nick Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Personally, sure, I wouldn't mind something like this near me. My
>>>> general philosophy is that more housing is better, from the cheapest
>>>> options like manufactured and mobile homes, all the way up to multi-story
>>>> single family developments. More building across the spectrum is the only
>>>> true way to solve the housing crisis (but much better transit would help
>>>> too!).
>>>>
>>>> -Nick Gardner
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 6:41 PM Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Would Lincoln entertain seeking locations for these truly affordable
>>>>> options?
>>>>>
>>>>> <541897041_615991624727882_3364590991054878389_n.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>> 38' Park Model <https://www.facebook.com/share/17UXVB9fPC/>
>>>>> facebook.com <https://www.facebook.com/share/17UXVB9fPC/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/share/17UXVB9fPC/>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to