What??? It played for you inside the mask????
hmmm... I never did test on another machine (Win2K, DMX2004).
And, yes, the composite is exactly what the outer graphic ends up being- that way- as you pointed out, the edges "disappear". It also has the extra benefit of helping me visually during video creation.
Stephen
Colin Holgate wrote the following on 4/4/2005 8:04 AM:
At 1:47 AM -0500 4/4/05, Stephen Ingrum wrote:
<http://www.leagueofdesign.com/qttest/testQTmask.zip>
That works fine for me, even with the sound going. It's odd that you have an already masked composite video going through the same mask again. Instead of having a sharp edge to the mask you end up seeing the left over fuzz from the original composite, but you could make an argument for that being a good thing if the outer graphic is going to be the same.
And, yes I know 818x694 is an odd size (but it had nothing to do with my masking problems).
I wasn't thinking that it would affect the mask, I was just curious why you had scaled the original video up before using it.
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [email protected] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [email protected] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
