----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Romanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > As far a ditching the internal library, I find it extremely useful > especially with LDMs. I keep the internal library exclusively for > creating temporary cast members on the fly.
That's a good point: I do that too, but traditionally, whenever I need this, I always have a "dynamic" cast somewhere, since I always used to use "internal" for scripts. Makes sense to start using it for that purpose instead. Just a pity I can't (a) Rename it, and (b) Stop it opening whenever you reload the project, although I suppose that gives me the opportunity to check it's always empty. <rant> Still, all these little things just seem like the stuff that Director *should* do without even having to ask, even if it's not all that important. I really just want to get rid of "Internal" to avoid any ambiguity, because in all my older movies it's the most important (or only) cast. Avoiding confusion is an important part of software engineering, even if it is something most people think of as quite minor. </rant> - Robert [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
