i saw DMX wil export dvd, what does this mean exactly? That a projector could be exported as "Ready to be burned" dvd?
Also saw a builded in 3d objects inspector... what does this means? That Ullala's 3dpi is builded in or is that another one?
Fabrice
Charlie Fiskeaux II heeft op woensdag 27 november 2002 om 16:39 het volgende geschreven:
Obvious natural progression? Not really. Director has always been a
platform for creating high-end multimedia apps/presentations that's also
robust enough to also support custom application development of varying
kinds. Flash has always been an animation platform with coding added so
that it's positioned as a pseudo-replacement for HTML; i.e. it's primarily
for web use. There are drastic considerations for the two different uses
that simply cannot be merged without losing functionality in both cases.
Personally, I think Director MX's Flash integration is very cool, but we
have to be careful about wanting it to go too far.
Charlie Fiskeaux II
Media Designer
The Creative Group
www.cre8tivegroup.com
859/858-9054x29
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Tweed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lingo-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: <lingo-l> ANN: Director MX
----- Original Message -----
That's essentially what I was asking, but I am not familiar enough with theWell, I never like phrases like "have as many Flash sprites on the stageOn a related topic, one of the biggest questions I want answered about the new tighter integration of Flash is whether we can now have as many Flash sprites on the stage as we want without instantly crippling performance.
as we want without instantly crippling performance". You may want 15, but
the next guy wants 50. ;) That aside, we did not change the fact that each
Flash sprite gets its own instance of the Flash Xtra and thus the memory
and performance demands of multiple SWF sprites is the same as in previous
releases.
details of implementation to know why performance of Flash objects in
Director is so much lower than if the same objects were arranged in a single
Flash movie.
We are most definitely looking into changing this so that all FlashWhat I'd really like to see is a shared code-base and consistent
sprites play under one Xtra instance but that's a *significant* change to
the Xtra that we felt was far too much work to accomplish in this release
given everything else that is going on. We have a keen eye on this moving
forward as it would be a big boost for using multiple assets in a single
movie.
object-model between both Flash and Director. If both of them used the same
low-level rendering engine (which Lingo would have access to, of course,
through imaging Lingo) and could each access any property of any object in
either language, then it should be a lot easier to mix the two.
This would basically mean that Flash and Director would be the same thing,
except that Flash would be a scaled down plugin with no support for
secondary scripting languages (i.e., Lingo, but while your at it...); Xtras,
etc. Shockwave/Director would be like Flash plus a load of other cool stuff
including more direct access to the low-level rendering engine. To me, this
seems like an obvious natural progression towards convergence for the two.
- Robert
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is
for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
