I just tried this, and as you say, it does start to play at 160x120.

However, if you just go into the score, you can change the size (W and H) to be 256x192, and it plays just fine that way too.

Irv

At 10:25 PM +0000 1/29/04, matt bindoff wrote:
For streaming QT in a browser, your size and speed are set in your QT prefs (at least for the "streaming" trailers on QuickTime.com).

this indeed is correct for streaming QT played in the QT player or embedded in a browser, but director seems to mess things up somehow.


to clarify what is happening consider the following:
http://stream.qtv.apple.com/events/oct/itunes/windows_ref.mov

if i play the above steam in QT player i get a movie that is 256x192
if i play the same stream in director i get a movie of 160x120

ah so it's a broadband / narrowband thing is it? no. a quick glance at my network usage shows an average 60K for both cases. so it seems that the same data is received by QT in director, but it is not displayed at the correct size. scaling just scales the 160x120 image. the plot thickens.

any ideas why this would happen? also could anyone please test the stream in director - i'd be interested to see if anyone can get it to play at 256x192.

is this perhaps a bug in the QT implementation?

matt



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]


--

Multimedia Wrangler.

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]

Reply via email to