Even before optimizing dot syntax, I would hope it would be completed.
Does anybody know if MX 2004 has made any steps in that direction? Can I
do things like castlib[1].member[5].name?
-- Welcome to Director -- put version -- "10.0" put castlib(1).member[1].name -- "foo" put the name of member 1 of castlib 1 -- "foo"
Returns "" if you do it on an empty member.
One of the main thrusts (shaddup, Grimm ;) of MX04 was plugging the holes (I've warned you already) in .syntax. You should find that a lot of the issues (!) with #field members have been addressed as well.
Warren Ockrassa | President, nightwares LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] nightwares LLC | Consulting Programming http://www.nightwares.com/ Author | Director 8.5 Shockwave Studio: A Beginner's Guide Chapter samples | http://www.nightwares.com/director_beginners_guide/
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
