At 3:02 PM -0700 5/19/01, Kerry Thompson wrote:
>>Looks like I'm right.
>
>Cool--thanks, Irv.
>
>I wasn't disputing your claim :-)
>
>In fact, your post didn't even mention speed--you mentioned it as an
>easier way (which I agree with).
Yes, it's definitely easier. And while I had assumed that it would
be faster, I had never tested it. So your message forced me to
challenge my theory by using creating real data. Thanks.
>
>I figured it was probably faster, and was just wondering if you had
>done any tests. It's a lazy Saturday afternoon, and I figured I'd
>run a couple tests myself, but why reinvent the wheel?
>
>But you just made the Saturday afternoon a tad lazier for me :-)
>
>I think I'll go to Macy's now that I've gotten you to do my work for me ;-)
Hey as long as you're going, would you please pick up a four-slice
toaster for me. Thanks :)
Irv
--
Lingo / Director / Shockwave development for all occasions.
(Home-made Lingo cooked up fresh every day just for you.)
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
