> and lingo isn't all that fast
> either - the other day i wrote this fractal thingie to test the speed of
> lingo vs c++ - the c version was like quadraticly faster - it did a
640x480
> 32bit render about 500 times faster than the lingo version....
Yeh, tell me about it. I've been working on a transition code that uses
bitmaps or Flash members for the transition. It's ashame that it takes so
long to execute. No matter how hard I try, I'll never get the performance
that a transition xtra offers. But its still cool to be able to make any
transition you want and I do get reasonable speed on a 300 mhz machine.
on a side note, I would like to see how a fractal equation works using
lingo. I've seen the "mandelbaum" equation (don't know the english word,
but its that classic example of the first fractal images) but I wouldn't
know how to to use it, and how to feed the results from equation back into
it. If you had an example I could look at maybe it will help me understand
it.
Frank
====================================
DIA3 GMBH
Metzstrasse 14
81667 M�nchen
Tel: 089 458738 0
Fax: 089 458738 99
Leonardo: 089 45873871
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
