On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 18:02 +0930, Glen Turner wrote: > The question is "self-sufficiency for what?" As it stands at the > moment this give self-sufficiency for the CPUs used in higher-end > military systems. Maybe that's the entirety of the aim. If their aim > is longer then a non-typical ISA starts to be problematic.
Problematic for whom? Possibly not for the Chinese... They've landed on Mars. They have a working (if 2016-standard) CPU. Both those things stand on very tall, very wide tech pyramids. There are probably a whole lot of Rumsfeld fields wrapped around other Chinese achievements. Credit where credit is due. It will be interesting to see how far they get in the next five years. Maybe by 2026, it will be the West looking up a Chinese tailpipe instead. I wonder if the Loongson CPUs being presented now are where their current best really is? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer GPG fingerprint: 61A0 99A9 8823 3A75 871E 5D90 BADB B237 260C 9C58 Old fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170 _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
