On 2021-07-25 18:32, Glen Turner wrote: > Self-sufficiency is its own goal. The current cost of that is performance > about a decade behind US-designed processors. > > The question is "self-sufficiency for what?" As it stands at the moment this > give self-sufficiency for the CPUs used in higher-end military systems. Maybe > that's the entirety of the aim. If their aim is longer then a non-typical > ISA starts to be problematic.
The integrated encryption might be interesting. Perhaps another objective is to better defend Chinese users and critical infrastructure against cyber attacks (including retaliatory attacks), especially since use of that technology could be mandated and would gradually become universal there. Of course mandated use of a single processor architecture, no matter how good, would carry its own risks... David Lochrin _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
