ChatGPT won’t take your job, but you will need to learn how to use it

By Liam Mannix January 21, 2023  
https://www.theage.com.au/national/chatgpt-won-t-take-your-job-but-you-will-need-to-learn-how-to-use-it-20230119-p5cdpn.html


As waves of new technology crash over and disrupt the economy, “learn to code” 
has become a common utterance – often to workers worried about losing their 
jobs to automation.

But what happens when technology finally comes for technology jobs?

That’s part of the promise and peril of ChatGPT and a new wave of AIs that can 
hold human-like conversations, write articles and academic essays, summarise 
reports, paint pictures, and – yes – write code.

Software engineer Mazen Kourouche, creative director at Litmus Digital, is 
already using the AI to replicate large parts of his work. ChatGPT excels at 
writing the algorithms that sit at the functional heart of good code. It is 
very good at building websites. And it can quickly parse Kourouche’s code and 
spot errors.

But like everyone The Age and the Herald spoke to for this story, Kourouche is 
not worried about it taking his job. He thinks it will simply make him more 
productive.

“AI is not going to replace our jobs,” he says. “But someone who knows how to 
use it will.”

ChatGPT is the public face of a breakthrough in AI models. Deep learning, a 
technique that allows AIs to learn from large amounts of data, has been around 
for decades but really took off in 2010 as computers powerful enough to run 
them efficiently started to arrive.

The field accelerated exponentially in 2017 with the development of transformer 
models like ChatGPT – an approach that allows AIs to understand the 
relationship between words.

By running these models on supercomputers – Microsoft built one specifically 
for ChatGPT – and training them on almost 600GB of data from books, Wikipedia 
and the wider internet, these AIs are able to convincingly generate human-like 
text. Others like DALL-E can generate whole artworks from text prompts.

The applications are obvious: report writing. Internet copywriting. Graphic 
design. Software engineering. Social media marketing. Customer service.

ChatGPT itself said it expects “jobs that involve repetitive tasks, data entry 
and simple decision making are most likely to be replaced … customer service 
representatives, telemarketers, and data entry clerks”.

It is hard to imagine society will lament the loss of telemarketers. But 
ChatGPT’s answer is somewhat modest. Few would consider radiology “simple 
decision-making”, yet a radiology AI performs almost as well as experts on 
radiology fellowship exams. A medical AI achieved 92.9 per cent accuracy 
answering a battery of common health questions. ChatGPT itself can almost pass 
US medical licensing exams.

Professor Declan Murphy, director of genitourinary oncology at the Peter 
MacCallum Cancer Centre, can already see the AI’s value in his own practice, 
like writing up-to-date information leaflets for newly diagnosed patients.

“We’re going to have to embrace them because they are not going away,” he says. 
“Resistance is futile.”

The models do have limitations. Centrally: they don’t actually understand what 
they are talking about.

Talking to a medical AI is like talking to an actor playing a doctor. They can 
confidently answer a wide range of medical questions, says Professor Nicholas 
Davis, co-director of the Human Technology Institute, but ultimately “you’re 
still talking to someone who is impersonating a doctor”.

That means they lack the “human element of cadence, voice of the customer, 
flow, idiom, even human empathy” that remains central to many creative 
pursuits, says Sydney-based SEO copywriter Rachel Green.

SEO copywriters write content that tries to respond to things people often 
search for – which requires the copywriter to put themselves in the shoes of 
the person asking the question. “In my experience, I don’t think a bot can ever 
replicate all that,” says Green.

The models seem likely to be socially disruptive. The software is capable of 
churning out essays complete with references, raising big questions about the 
future of homework.

“Clearly, we won’t be asking people to write 2000 words on a medical topic [in 
medical school],” says Murphy. “I don’t see how we’re going to presume people 
aren’t using AI tools. That will have to change.”

They may even change the way we search the internet.

Many Google searches are questions: Why did Russia invade Ukraine? Can you get 
COVID twice? These searches return websites – but an AI can return actual 
answers.

Google has held a semi-monopoly on internet searches for two decades; the 
company’s executives fear ChatGPT – which is partially owned by Microsoft – 
could spell the end of all that, The New York Times has reported.

Through history, we have been through many waves of technological disruption we 
thought would destroy jobs – the car, the calculator, the computer, Microsoft 
Excel. Yet, Australia’s unemployment rate sits at 3.5 per cent.

The Australian Institute of Machine Learning’s Dr Paul Dalby, author of a 
Senate report on AI’s impact on the future of work, points to a theory known as 
Baumol’s cost disease – which posits that as one part of the economy becomes 
more productive it gives those workers more money to spend, which grows other 
parts of the economy and creates new jobs.

“Unemployment is entirely disconnected from automation,” he says. “If we 
automated every single job we have today we would still have jobs in the 
future. Rich people just have to spend more money on shit.”

Rather than replace jobs, AIs like ChatGPT will make workers more efficient by 
automating repetitive tasks, allowing them to spend more time on stuff that 
only humans can do and therefore making them more productive.

Graphic designer Justin Marchant, founder of Wollongong-based Black Bear 
Creative, is already using ChatGPT to write blogs and social media content and 
help quickly generate ideas for graphics.

“You’re seeing it now in the industry – it’s a great time-saving tool,” he says.

He does not expect it will replace graphic designers – just make them more 
efficient. The key, he says, is the “prompt”, the instructions given to the AI. 
Amateur users might ask a simple question, but the AI’s real power can be 
unlocked by designing long, detailed and tested instruction sets that transform 
it into a job interviewer, translator, plagiarism checker, and even a 
relationship coach.

PromptBase.com is already selling these AI prompts, like a viral tweet prompt 
or an AI lawyer prompt.

Indeed, rather than replace jobs the emergence of AIs might end up creating a 
new industry of AI-oracles trained to talk to them and interpret their words.

“To get the most out of it, you still need someone who knows what they are 
doing,” says Marchant.

--

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to